Over time, buildings get worse but still hold historical significance. Therefore, legislators have prohibited their destruction. However, some argue that these structures are outdated and should be replaced with new constructions. This essay will explain why preserving such buildings is not essential and how embracing progress can lead to a better future.
Old buildings are typically quite wide and located in the city center, one of the most crowded areas. This space could be used for more beneficial purposes, such as schools, offices, or apartment buildings. That is the approach many governments have taken, replacing old structures with more essential buildings. Moreover, restoring and maintaining historical buildings can be more costly than constructing new ones with improved facilities.
History is undeniably a significant part of a country’s culture, but it should not inhibit progress. If we were always conservative and frequently referred to the past in our decision-making, no changes would occur, and as a result, we would be far behind in development today. However, this does not mean that history should be disregarded. It can be preserved through media, books, and education in schools and universities. As long as history remains in our minds, it will never disappear.
In conclusion, we can conclude that when we consider the actual value and discomfort old buildings bring, they are not very beneficial and should be replaced with new ones featuring modern design and technology. Additionally, progress should not be inhibited by the past, as there are alternative ways to preserve history.