People hold differing views about the merits and demerits of locating in places which are geographically distanced from where they were nourished. Whilst some advocates believe that living in development-oriented areas bears favorable aspects, I would agree that its underlying implications are greater and it should, therefore, be taken into consideration elaborately.
On the one hand, it is argued that individuals derive countless benefits when settling abroad or inhabiting in metropolises. First and foremost, becoming metropolitans is a practical way to make ends meet and crave for promotion in a cut-throat society. According to some fervent belief, the role of the business industry operates bustling in big cities which is truly crucial for postgraduates and part-time workers, not only providing advance training and prospective occupations but also lucrative paycheck. As a consequence, human resources working in economy-based organizations are mostly youngsters and high school students, who are physically vigorous, full of innovations and contribute significantly to the tax revenue for the Government. What is more, resentment, hostility, conflicts and social riots are prone to be eradicated when individuals are entitled to rights as well as opportunities to prove their ability and ambition. On the edge of turning into utopia-centered society, governments are purported to divert part of their coffers to create more job opportunities in order not to missout talents to develop the nations. Subsequently, there will certainly be no longer discrimination, elitism, a two-tier system and pecking order, equality of opportunities is prioritized and ready for global cooperation.
On the other hand, I endorse the standpoint that an outburst of inhabitants congregated in industrial zones exerts far more detrimental impacts and should not be put into practise. To commence with, overseas and provincial citizens are regarded as the spearhead in conveying and absorbing cultures. Nonetheless, this culture-crossed phenomenon can easily become a double-edged sword which also causes homogeneity, losing individual, unique traits and regional identities. As a result, social unity is susceptible to be broken, leading to the independence of nations and its associated problems as well as harsly competitions for local businesses and individuals. Besides, carbon footprints from physical travel are the culprit of environmental damages. The more overpopulation occurred, the higher demand to feed the increasing population and intensive farming. As a matter of fact, contamination is likely to boost the greenhouse effect, climate change and natural disasters that wreak havoc on the survival of all living creatures. Last but not least, the government’s expenditures utilized in dealing with society-related problems, especially crime and poverty will apparently increase. It is inevitable that in some cases, inhabitants might feel resentful and estranged, even protest to divert part of their income for tax paying just for solving irrelevant issues.
In conclusion, notwithstanding people believe that living in concrete jungles is truly beneficial, I’m strongly convinced that this has more adverse effects, and we should put it under scrutiny.