With the advent of technology, processing movies seemed to be easier for everyone than ever, sparking controversy across society on whether or not it is a positive enhancement. This essay aims to denote my support for the view that the merits of this phenomenon are eclipsed by its drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several justifications why producing films ubiquitously through digital assistance is beneficial. The first merit is that technology may boost the number of filmmakers, leading to the diversity of content. In other words, different perspectives on a similar subject, ranging from vlogging daily moments to debating global concerns, can enable viewers to consider the issue from various angles thoroughly. For instance, on Christmas Eve, several creators are determined to record cooking shows to prepare for the festival, while others focus on condemning the worldwide food crisis due to citizens’ waste. Furthermore, exerting technological elements on producing films allows them to become more accessible and alleviate enormous expenses. By utilising basic gadgets, such as smartphones and laptops incorporated with editing apps, not only can individuals lessen the pressure of excelling in complicated filming tools but also reduce large production prices.
On the other hand, the drawbacks offered when even a single person is able to participate in the film industry merely with digital supplies are more notable. The main hassle is the growth of deviant information. The more content is published, the more hurdles in censorship are encountered, facilitating cybercrime to take the loopholes of insecurity to disseminate illegal movies. According to recent research conducted by Yale University, since Artificial Intelligence was explored, the number of heretical films rose significantly, attributing to the 30% decline in controlling annual filming works. Additionally, when completing movies seems possible for anyone, numerous products tend to be individualistic instead of comprehensive. Sometimes, these one-sided contents may polarise and cause conflicts in the community if they lack a variety of access to pressing issues, especially policy and religion.
In conclusion, despite several advantages provided when a single person can manufacture films, including varied viewpoints and plausible participation, the disadvantages it causes, such as deviant works and sweeping dissension, are more striking.