In the modern era, builders argue that old structures should be destroyed with advanced ones, while conservationists state they must be saved. While I accept that the providing every wall protections is difficult, but I largely disagree with this idea of destroying it because it carry a historic with itself and completely constructing new buildings can be require lots of money which can affect the development of cities.
To begin with, one of the main reasons why I disagree with that idea is that it can be very costly to rebuild the whole new structures, constructions in the place. This can cause direct impact in the progress of country. Instead of providing funds to rebuild these structures, the governments should invest in different important things like quality education, fast transportations and people well-being. To illustrate, a country has a lot of projects which need tons of money to complete it. In this types of scenario, they have to put money in these activities rather than started to build whole new structures.
Furthermore, another important reason is that there types of old moment hold historical importance. This marks refers to the incident. In ancient time period and give us ideas of how the people live in their time. It also helps to import foreign currency in the country. To illustrate, this kind of structures is made from different kind of things which is rarely present in today’s world. It can attract a lot of tourists in the places which can make financial benefit to the country and its people, the living standard of people will increase and support the can become the backbone of country.
Tn conclusion, I firstly disagree with the statement of history of old structures, maintaining ancient structures is costly and sometimes practical yet it is progress of city’s character and tourism.