People often say that the public’s right to know about all crimes, however excessive reporting may create unnecessary fear. I believe that crime information should be made public, provided that information would be accurate, responsible and secure community safety.
The information about crime can help people make safer decisions and prevent themselves from dangerous situations. If people did not know about thefts and robberies, they would not realize about risks in their own area. Consequently they could not prepare elementary things, which may make their life and home safer. Were in some zone to be regular thefts, people would know about it and make decisions. They could be more cautious, check whether the windows and doors are closed, and also would install the cameras and be more careful. Only by providing reliable information from law-enforcement agencies can it be better for people than rumors, because it might help rate genuine risks.
Too much sensational reporting or excessive detail reporting can create the impression that danger is everywhere. Nevertheless, the problem should be solved through responsible disclosure and not by relying on disinformation. Sources have to understand that they need to post verified facts, nature, location and frequency of offences, and not graphic details, unconfirmed allegations, victim-identifying information and details that may compromise an investigation. Were information to be posted following these rules, people would not have the feeling that the crime-rate is higher than it is. Official news could help combat rumors and misinformation in social media. So sources should balance public confidence, victim protection and the integrity of ongoing investigations.
In conclusion, communities should have access to reliable crime-rate information, because the public has a right to know about it. However, posts should follow some rules, so society does not have panic and impression insecurity.