Currently, most art galleries exhibit foreign and national arts together. According to some individuals’ opinions,only national arts should be demonstrated in galleries, as they are causing visitors less interest in national arts. However, international arts also have needs, such as providing information regarding various cultures and traditions. Therefore, I argue that both national and international art should be presented separately in different parts of art galleries.
It is true that foreign arts attract more visitors’ attention. When people go to art galleries, they skip watching national exhibitions since they find them boring. I can give a notable example from my life in this regard. Last month, our teacher brought us to the art gallery to enhance our knowledge about both international and national arts. It was the first time that we visited there, and when we entered the gallery, we saw a variety of works of art together. Intriguingly, almost no one watched our national arts as they were hard to understand, and most of us skipped watching them. These kinds of phenomena happen frequently, and they are the root cause of people’s lack of knowledge about our nationality.
Having said that, there is also the importance of international arts. We can learn about other cultures’ histories and traditions by watching them. They really help us to improve our outlooks and make people interested in us. To illustrate, Monalisa was drawn by Leonardo Davinci, which made everyone interested in French history and art.
Thus, in my opinion, both art types should exist in galleries separately, and someone should guide visitors to demonstrate national arts that they need to pin down. Guides should show people first national arts and then internationals.
To sum up, I strongly believe that foreign arts should not be restricted; maybe there is an alternative way to keep both national and international arts important, as I examined in the second body paragraph.