In today’s society, some people argue that higher education should be offered free of charge to all students, whereas others believe that learners ought to bear the cost of their university studies. Although the second perspective may increase economic growth, the first perspective is far better, as it can make it easier for many people to get studies.
On the one hand, when universities establish a regulation that their students should pay for their studies, it can significantly offer a myriad of advantages for society. Paying studies to the university would increase the economic growth, which results in improving the infrastructure in the university. For example, the universities in Indonesia have good infrastructure, because their students often pay for their studies. Additionally, this situation also will lead to easier for students to complete the tasks, as the university has a good infrastructure. which significantly enhance the value of their students.
On the other hand, it is imperative to reassess that the second viewpoint also has beneficial effects. From a societal standpoint, when governments make tertiary education free, this phenomenon can increase the rate of people who cannot study, which will decrease because many people can access studies easily, which significantly makes them more productive. For instance, in Australia, all higher education there is free, which results in many people having opportunities to take the lessons. Moreover, this situation can lead to the future of the nation’s children, who will get jobs, which makes the unemployment rate go down.
In conclusion, while some believe that students should cover the expenses of their university education, others advocate for making higher education freely accessible to everyone. Although requiring payment may contribute to economic development, providing free education is a more favorable approach, as it allows broader access to academic opportunities.