Some people say that art offers no value in enhancing the quality of human life, so they think the government should allocate money to other areas such as education and healthcare… Although I agree that other sectors are crucial to human life, I still believe that art is equally influential in a community’s life.
To start with, art can improve people’s emotional well-being. It means that by creating art or making music, a person is likely to feel a sense of relaxation, and it helps to decrease anxiety or stress levels. Moreover, this creative process allows individuals to express complex emotions and feelings. Therefore, art serves as a great way to entertain individuals and mitigate negative thoughts and detrimental emotions.
The second reason is that the government can use art as a means of preserving and promoting culture. What I mean by this is that painting can recreate and transmit the traditional culture of a nation to future generations. This can cultivate a deeper appreciation for our national culture among young people, fostering a stronger sense of patriotism and pride. For example, Dong Ho paintings vividly depict the daily life and labor of Vietnamese farmers, and traditional festivals are also portrayed, bearing the distinct cultural characteristics of the Northern Delta region.
However, it is undeniable that art also has its drawbacks. Art is prohibitively expensive, making it inaccessible to many. Furthermore, the issue of art forgery and plagiarism poses a significant threat to the integrity of the art market and public trust. Although art plays a significant role in human life, it cannot avoid having negative impacts.
In conclusion, while some assume that art cannot provide immediate tangible benefits, I firmly believe that art can enhance emotional well-being, stimulate creativity, and have a positive cultural impact. Therefore, government investment in the arts is not only justified but essential for creating a more fulfilling and enriching society.