One of the main objectives of any country’s government is the security guarantee for its citizens. However, sometimes it leads to unethical situations, such as the authority’s access to people’s mobile phones. Thus, some people argue that it should be prohibited and should be allowed only after getting permission. The current essay discusses and explores both views, providing reasonable arguments and examples to support the presented opinion.
On the one hand, access to phones significantly increases the government’s capabilities of preventing crimes. As criminals mostly use mobile devices for communication purposes, the opportunity to gather their messages might help police unfold their plans and prevent them. Moreover, even after the incident, mobile phones can provide clues that will further accelerate the investigation process, making it more efficient. For instance, the personal massages of victims usually help officers solve cases like kidnappings or drug trafficking.
On the other hand, these actions might considered as a violation of the right to privacy, which is guaranteed by the government. Firstly, most of the individuals will likely feel like an invention. Secondly, the government might misuse the collected data for their personal intentions. For example, they can reveal the private messages of their political competitors to make them look bad.
In conclusion, although the access to the mobile phones of citizens has some negative outcomes, the benefits that it provides will anyways outweigh, as it might save numerous lives. Nevertheless, more deep investigations might be needed in that field, in order to come up with a more reliable conclusion.