It is argued that states should prioritize national defense over social programs such as education and healthcare. This essay agrees that national defense should come first. Firstly, a defeat in war can lead to national disasters; secondly, a powerful military can contribute to a country’s economic growth.
The consequences of a military defeat can be devastating for a country. A nation with a weak military can be easily threatened and defeated in wars, regardless of its level of education or healthcare systems. This can result in significant loss of life and the destruction of cultural heritage. For instance, the Persian Empire, which had a rich legacy of scientists and scholars, lost much of its glory and culture due to its weak military during wars with Arabs.
Moreover, a strong military can bolster a society’s economy. Countries with powerful military forces are often intimidating to other nations, enabling them to secure favorable terms in trade negotiations and economic cooperation. This military strength can translate into economic prosperity. For example, a historical study illustrates that the root cause of Germany’s substantial economic development during World War II was its military power.
In conclusion, national defense should be the top priority in terms of resource allocation because of the economic benefits it can bring and the catastrophic consequences that can result from a weak military