It is often argued that longer prison sentences can prevent crime, while others believe that rehabilitation is more effective. Supporters of the former view believe this because severe punishment is eesential for serious crimes. I agree with the latter view because educational training may help offenders to change their behaviour.
Those who support first view argue that longer prison sentences may deter criminals. This is because jail sentence can create fear in them. If the offenders are not scared from severe punishment, they may commit a serious crime. They know that after harming victims, they will go unpunished or be released from prison on parole. For instance, if a criminal has murdered someone and receives no penalty, the victim has lost their life while the offender continues to enjoy theirs. As a result, by creating the fear of longer prison sentences, public safety can be ensured.
Some individuals proritise rehabilitation because it discourages people from commiting a crime. If governments provide vocational training, it helps offenders to develop skills. They can do some kind of job, which may reduce recidividm. For example, if a robber robs a bank, they should be given employment opprtunities to reduce financial pressure that caused their crime. As a result, training can be an alternative to prison sentences. Therefore, i believe this approch is more effective because changing behaviour of a person may help prevent further offences.
In conclusion some people believe that longer penalty can make a criminal better person, on the other hand some individuals support rehabilitation. I agree with secon view because by giving them support and opportunities, they may avoid criminal activities.