It is said that, rather than the literature and history of other countries, it is more imperative to educate children regarding the literature and history of their own country. Personally, I believe that educating the literature and history of other countries should not be prioritised, but their own literature and history.
Initially, educating children about their own literature and history can help them get to know about the culture and value of their countries. Moreover, they can be aware of how their civilization has changed over time. For example, in Myanmar, Students have to study ancient ancestors in their school curriculum such as General Aung San, who is well-known for Myanmar independent hero and Anaw Ya Htar King, who established Bagan city. By knowing their history, children can pass to their next generation.
On the other hand, teaching the literature and history of other countries can also be a good idea. Having had adequate command of other countries’ literature and history, they do not have to worry about not fitting in with other societies. If people are knowledgeable about others, they may lack knowledge of their own. For example, people may be asked about their own tradition and history. When they can not answer, it can lead to embarrassment. As a consequence, they may be underestimated.
In the final analysis, teaching children the literature and history of others helps to explore the world, however,I reckon that it is quite crucial to teach children their own literature and history.