The debate over primary focus of study in universities is escalated in recent years. While some believe that universities should prepare students for the future workforce, others argue that educational institutes should prioritize personal development by developing critical thinking and enhancing knowledge. This essay will examine both views before presenting my personal perspective.
On the one hand, supporters of emphasis on the future employment believe that if students are trained in the universities for the workforce, they will contribute to strengthen the national economy. Having prepared the future workforce particularly extensively in demand fields such as technology, science and healthcare, will help to reduce the financial burden. As a result, governments can take the advantages to support the national economy in the long-term. Another benefit of this approach is that this enables students to work in international companies. When adults are equipped with professional skills in universities, it makes them proficient to work at global level with practical knowledge.
On the other hand, advocates of prioritizing personal growth during higher education argue that this approach prepares children for the real-world challenges. By developing rational thinking and enhancing knowledge, pupils will not only grow personally but professionally also. It is often seen that people who were not taught to manage uncertain situations in universities often fail to avoid mental strain despite being a successful career. Additionally, this will strengthen a social fabric and ensures safety in critical situations. If higher education’s focus is only on workforce, students will unable to response critically in certain situations such as a team conflict at workplace. However, when learners are prepared to think rationally, they react accordingly to resolve issues which helps to strengthen social relations.
In my opinion, I firmly believe that universities should strike a balance between the focus on workforce and personal development. A balanced approach should be considered where STEM subjects and interpersonal growth is focused equally. Therefore, students are prepared to contribute to the economy while developing essential life skills like confidence, critical thinking and problem solving.
In conclusion, although critics have their valid reasons for their believes, I am convinced that universities should prioritize overall development rather than focusing on one approach. Governments should impose a policy which ensures that students are trained to encounter professional and personal challenges exceptionally.