This essay first dissus on the strength of women and second, they are bad at combat roles.
firstly, women hone loss strength and endorane As compared to men. due to wormen are weaker than men due to their body are smaller and less musde density, this is because. At military programme trainees would face lot of physical challenges, espeially when both men and women have to carry heavy guns and sleds. A good example of this is in the US training programme all the trainees regardless the gender would have to drag-sprint wea weighted kettlebells, as one of their check points.
Another good reason is that women are not suitable for combat roles as women woold need to train as hard as men do, and had to deal with gone for their weapons, This is because women are better at non- combat roles Which they are good at talking to people and taking care of patients doe to these jeos roles are more suitable to Their human – nature A good example of this is during WWII women are served as medies service and other non-combat roles, this mean that no matter how mu time passes, and with those gender equality and feminist campaigning women are still not suitable for combat roles in the military service. Sometimes it The truth that women are not capable for this job, for in 2003 the a war between Iraq and thie United states, and the US army assigned a two female soldiers to do the mission and as a result they have failed their mission in the war, this show that female are not capable for risky and adventurous role.
To conclude, I strongly believe that women should not join or serve in the military Service. As their Strength are weaker than, and they are bad at combat roles.