There is ongoing debate about which accommodation is better to live in; while some individuals would rather choose a house, others find flats more convenient. This essay will argue that the benefits of living in a house outweigh the drawbacks when compared to life in an apartment. This essay will first demonstrate that houses provide more space and amenities, followed by an analysis of why the primary disadvantage, namely the cost of living, is not valid.
The major advantage of living in a house is that it is more spacious. There are numerous rooms, including those for leisure purposes, gym facilities, and rooms for guests, which is significantly beneficial if a person has an extended family with children. Additionally, houses offer tranquility and extra outdoor conveniences, which are also essential merits. Focusing on the former, while living in a house, inhabitants will not be distracted by their neighbors and can do everything they want without worrying about noise pollution. Meanwhile, the latter provides residents with plenty of facilities such as their own gardens, yards, and playgrounds.
One possible drawback is the cost of living. Many people think that a house incurs more expenses than an apartment. However, there is no evidence to support this claim. Families from European countries who live in houses consider that their cost of living is at the same level as the average expenditure for living in an apartment. It is also said that despite the same payment, the facilities offered by the two types of accommodation are constantly different.
In conclusion, the fact that living in a house leads to tranquility and a comfortable life full of opportunities clearly outweighs the unreliable claims about its cost.