The debates over balance between work and rest have proponents on both sides. First said that finance gives access to wider opportunity as well as provides more colorful lifestyle. However, others argue that finance race leads to burnout and limits person in self-development. In this essay I will overview both opinions and give reasonable unbiased conclusion.
Supporters of shifted to money balance can afford a higher standard of living. Means more various spare time, including traveling to different countries, affordability of privet medicine, alongside with education opportunity. Such activities are opened to people with high income, having narrow free time though. Moreover, earning more money means having a statue in society. Sometimes it is more valuable that personal characteristics. Top managers, chiefs, and wealthy people can be cruel, selfish, as well as mean, but still have respect from public. Resulting in conclusion that finance is more essential for comfort life.
However, some says that not all goods can be bought for money. They give such examples as love and time. Firstly, people with skewness to plethora of time can spend it to meaningful connections. For instance, it may be having a family hobby or prepare outstanding date for the partner. In addition, leisure pursuit can be focused on yourself. For instance, learning new languages or get knowledge about spiritual development are freely available. You can find on YouTube or on the Internet. Besides, this kind of self-development requires low or minimal costs.
In conclusion, while the finance prosperity is crucial for comfort living, we cannot deny contribution of rest in personal well-being. That is why I suppose that well-balanced schedule: enough free time paired with moderate income gives more meaningful and happy life. Thus, time overweight money.