Some individuals argue that stores are supposed to prioritize locally produced food items rather than importing food from other nations. I totally agree with this statement because overseas products are unaffordable1 and support local businesses2
One reason I support this argument is that importing food items is often expensive1, potentially leading to excessive consumerism. This is because products from overseas require several processes before they can be shipped to other countries, such as preservation techniques to ensure the food remains fresh for longer periods. These processes involve significant expenses, which ultimately drive up the cost of these products in the market in order to they earn a high profit. For example, fish imported from China is often sold at higher prices in Indonesian markets compared to local fish due to the additional costs of packaging and preservation to prevent spoilage.
Another reason is that prioritizing local food items can boost local enterprise2, resulting in strengthening the domestic economy. That is to say, when stores focus on selling local products, it raises awareness about these items among consumers, leading to increased demand. As more people buy local foods, local industrial benefit from higher sales. Therefore, they produce the items more than usually, which can boosts their income. For instance, a study by the University of Sydney found that sales of locally produced foods in Australia increased by 45% after the government restricted food imports in 2023.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that overseas meals are not affordable1 and selling local products is a beneficial strategy as it supports local businesses2. Ideally, the authorities should consider to limiting trade importing foods to promote the consumption of locally produced
food.