It is often argued that allocating too much concentration and many recources for safety of wildlife habitants and birds.Personally, I strongly disagree with this view because human activities are harming wildlife and preserving these animals is vital for maintain the ecological balance.
One key reason why I disagree with the idea of paying too much attention and allocating many resources for helping animals is that humans themselves are the primary cause of harm to wildlife. There are human activities such as cutting trees for building new houses and cities which harm animals and steal their homes. As a result, many wild animals are facing many challenges, in particular falling prey to diseases, decreasing in number, oreven becoming extinct. For example, the Bali tiger used to live on the small island of Bali, but its population started decreasing dramatically and it became extinct because of land occupation.
In addition, another significant point is that each animal has its own role in the ecological balance. There is a chain in the wildlife where animals feed on each other, meaning that if one animal were to become extinct, it might cause an increasing number of other animals. For example, in ancient times in Europe, people believed that cats were associated with evil and they started killing them. Consequently, it not only caused an increasing number of rats but also led to the spread of cholera.
Therefore, protecting every single animal is not just for survival, but for keeping the wildlife world in balance.
In conclusion, people should protect wildlife and allocate enough resources because these problems are caused by human activities and they have a huge impact on the ecological balance.