Many people have different view about whether government gives too much attention and resources to protect wild animal and birds. I partly disagree with this argument for the following reasons.
On the one hand, excessive attention to wild animal and birds will reduce the resouces allocated to human. In most of the developing or undeveloped countries, there are lack of resources allocared to education, technology, or medical. These three allocation are necessary for human to improve their life’s quality. For example, if government give more resources to medical, hospitals can purchase medical machine and more appropriate medicine for patient. Therefore, people can be healthier and can live longer.
On the other hand, protecting wild animal and birds is the base of protecting human. Some people may believe helping wild animal or birds is unrelated to themselves, but the relationship is exist. For example, from the perspective of farmers, there are a lot of bugs which are harmful to their farm. Some kind of birds may eat the harmful insects to protect their crops. If birds are getting extincted, farmers’ result will decline. In addition, from the perspective of fishmen, they will lose a lot of results if a huge amount of fishes are killed, leading to unemployment.Therefore, it is profitable to human from the existence of wild animal and birds.
In conclusion, although i acknowledge that dealing with human needs directly is important, protecting wild animal is also significant to human. This is because wild animal can help human in different ways potentially, such as in farming and fishing. Therefore, I believe the protection of wild animal as a base of protecting human should be on a first priority.