In the contemporary world, the issue of whether students ought to pay for their own fee tuition instead of society due to benefits acquired by themselves has sparked a controversial dispute. According to the writer’s perspective, I totally disagree with this suggestion since giving students to pursue higher education can bring about the benefits of quality labor sources and a lower unemployment rate.
To commence with, providing opportunities to students pursuing a higher education can offer a greater human resource. In the other words, universities can cultivate the skills and grasp for worthy students via their well-established curriculum, therefore, students who endeavor to dedicate to the enhancement of various aspects of our lives can bring prosperity to the whole community. For example, a medical institute in Vietnam has a fund raised by the dwellers to convey scholarships to talented candidates and after graduation, they will become competent physicians to devote their best to fostering the overall health of the society.
A more compelling reason why I am in disagreement is that when all students attend to tertiary education regardless their social circumstances and also financial background, the unemployment rate would be declined. This is because being graduated from a college or university can have better ability to compete applying for a better job with a greater wage. As a result, the crime attributed from the high rate of unemployment can be reduced and ultimately the communities can receive advantages through this reduction.
In conclusion, quality human resource and lower unemployment rate are the benefits of fee tuition charged by the whole society. Therefore, it should have been demonstrated that society must be charged to the tuition of tertiary for the student owing to the advantages included.