A large number of individuals suggest that states should create strict limit era people spend on social media to protect mental condition and social cohesion.Others believe that such limits infringe on personal freedom and are unnecessary.In my opinion the limits of time must to have the children under 16. In this essay i will discuss both sides and will give my opinion.
On the one hand, social media is the valuable part of our life. Everything is connected with artificial intelligence, Not only adults came reliable of technology,and the learners, toddlers.Without digital tools everyone feels themselves weak and defenceless.And that is not problem of people.Authorities accessed it, and made it.But they did not expect that they came depended of innovation.When they heard that innovation will have a limits they were in panic, in stress.
On the other hand, Authorities was in opinion that they will see the measure of use technology, so they make it accessible.Nowdays, especcialy Learners cheat, or copy tests in the internet, also have a large number of bullying, and scams.these types of examples came of reasons to make limits
In my opinion,that the governments do it right. But they must to limit a students under 16, because they can not protect themselves. Authorities are try to save them community.However , adults do not understand it rightly. Firstly, they must to show this problem, and instance of education. Because in the future our pupils can be limited, how to connect with others.
Overall, numerous quantity of people argue that states should impose strict limits on the social media to protect mental health and social cohesion. Other sides believe that this limits personal freedom. I believe that Governments did a mistake, but they are right