There is a prevailing opinion that university students ought to focus their studies on scientific and technological subjects, which are perceived to have a more substantial impact on society. Conversely, there are those who advocate for students to pursue their passions, irrespective of the subject matter. From my perspective, every academic discipline taught at the university level has potential implications for both personal growth and societal advancement. Nevertheless, this argument encompasses two contrasting viewpoints, which will be deliberated upon below.
On one hand, the swift progression of science and technology has had far-reaching effects on various aspects of human life, making it difficult to downplay their significance. Furthermore, embracing progress is essential to avoid obsolescence. For example, the ubiquitous influence of computers has revolutionized contemporary society to the extent that proficiency in operating them is virtually indispensable. Individuals inclined towards these fields may achieve success in life; undoubtedly, a universally acknowledged objective. On the other hand, subjects outside the realm of science and technology, such as economics, philosophy, and the arts, are pivotal in cultivating a cultured and enriched community. Furthermore, genuine passion can propel individuals to excel in their chosen field. For instance, had the celebrated musician Bryan Adams forsaken his passion for music in favor of conforming to societal standards, the world would have been deprived of a phenomenal artist. Consequently, prioritizing passion over the perceived utility in the future is paramount.
In conclusion, while it is evident that science and technology wield substantial influence in our lives, it is imperative to recognize the indispensable role of the arts and humanities in shaping societal norms, ideologies, ethics, and beliefs. Therefore, students are encouraged to pursue subjects of their choice, prioritizing passion over an overly pragmatic concern for future utility.