Several societies that charity organizations should serve only for individuals in their own nations. In contrast, other think that these organizations should help people with appropriate services in some parts of the world. While there are some reasons for the former, I firmly believe that the latter has more compelling grounds to be considered.
To commence with, there are some reasons for which people believe that giving charity to solely their own country should be done. Firstly, prioritizing self-nation to get charity might lead to harmonious conditions. This is mainly because the social gap in the country could disappear. For example, in the UK, there are no more people because the charity programs help them to cover their needs. Therefore, the social gap between the rich and poor could be reduced, and it would lead to harmonious conditions. In addition, giving charity to people in their own country tends to create a significant status in the world. It is mainly known that some countries want to be addressed as a developed country.
On the other hand, there are some aspects that need to be considered for helping people wherever they live. Helping people in some part of the world with certain immediate conditions would be extremely helpful. For example, in some countries which are facing health problems such as endemic, charity could help them by giving aid to recover their needs. Therefore, it could reduce the possibility of larger problems, such as contamination to other parts of the world. Furthermore, helping people wherever they live could be a strong bond between countries. It is mainly believed that one country and another are needed for each other.
In conclusion, there is a long-standing debate between individuals whether charity organizations should prioritize their own country of help others in some par of the world. Whereas the former has some impacts, I reaffirm that the latter is more beneficial as a human.