It is often said that many people are drawing attention to the expenditure of pollution. In fact, there are some who hold firmly to their belief that offices and individuals producing pollution should take the responsibility to pay the fees. Conversely, others convincingly argue that the government should pay for polluted affects. Therefore, several key points concerning this issue will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, there are some persuasive rationales to support the claim that the fees of pollution should be paid by companies and people who related to this cause. In this day and age, emissions from factors and the mining-minerals industry has increased significally, leading to air pollution in numerous areas. In addition, because of the rise of population, the more facilities and amenities needed, the more forest needed exploring, which come to less oxygen to recharge carbon-footprint. Another point to make is that emissions from a wide variety of vehicles causing a risk to environment, especially the air. If companies and people had to take responsibility for the environment fees, they would aware of the serious problems they caused in daily life. This also make a huge sense of sharing the government’s budget, especially developing ones.
On the other hand, there is compelling evidence supporting an alternative viewpoint. Gas and fossil fuel, which is most harmful for environment, has the undeniable use. People need fuel for transports, gas for cooking, and so on. If the government implemented the law that each person have to pay the extra bills for this, it would bring a concern about family budget. A prime example of this is drivers and delivery people who use fuel transports, they may not afford the extra bills.
In conclusion, it is my trong belief that offices and individuals should take the responsibility for pollution instead of the government. Implementing the law which citizens and the government are equally pay to clean up pollution is my highly recommend.