Over the past few decades, there has been a debate over whether the responsibility of shaping children into good members of the community should be taught by parents or school. In this essay, I will discuss both views and present my own perspective with relevant examples in the ensuing paragraphs.
On one hand, those who support the idea of parental guidance believe it has more benefits. The primary reason is the significance of daily communication because children absorb most of the fundamental manners in their own homes. For instance, even table manners play a pivotal role in respecting others or observing their parents helping the elderly, making a difference. Additionally, everything starts from what household a child is raised in. If it values kindness and honesty, there is a tendency that the child will likely carry these important qualities in the future regardless of any influences.
On the other hand, supporters of the opposing view contend that schools provide essential social interaction that many parents cannot demonstrate. First and foremost, engaging in school group projects teaches students co-operation and teamwork values, while learning on their own may educate them about being independent and enhance their problem-solving skills. Moreover, educational facilities also open the door for students to diverse perspectives, therefore preparing them for future social participation.
In conclusion, even though the oversimplified view believes that the parents are the responsible ones to teach them about being a responsible citizen of the society, schools also play a crucial role in educating them about the characteristics that guardians replicate. From my perspective, I firmly believe that the responsibility of teaching children lies with both parents and schools, each having its own drawbacks and advantages.