In recent years, governments are allocating more funds for arts by building art galleries and theaters. Some people argue that more money should be spent on public services instead of arts to improve people’s living standard. In my view, although it is essential for the government to fund public services, art is also an indispensable part of society that should be valued.
Admittedly, investing in public services is the top priority of the government. A major reason is to ensure all children of all income levels have access to better education. For example, more schools need to be constructed to accommodate more students. Teaching facilities like library and playground also need to be improved to enhance the learning experiences of children. Moreover, investment on public transports such buses and subways are essential considering that the improvement of these facilities could allow people to travel more easily.
However, this does not mean that it is unworthy for the government to spend money on art. Although people do not feed on art, it is still their natural instinct to pursue beauty. Once the survival needs are met, people start seeking spiritual fulfillment by creating and appreciating art, which helps them to calm down and relax after long hours of labor. Without art, life would be dulling.
Moreover, many art groups also need the financial support from the government. For example, Peking Opera, which is a valuable cultural heritage of China, might not have survived and thrived without government funding. It is the same with many other art forms of art all over the world.
From my perspective, it is the government’s duty to facilitate public services that provide for the basic needs of citizens. Nevertheless, art is also an important part of human life and deserves equal attention and support from the government.