In recent years, artistic fields have become a primary concern, leading to numerous discussions worldwide. While some argue that the arts need to receive less government funding than public amenities, I believe that the government should adopt a balanced policy to allocate its budget between public services and the arts.
There are many valid reasons why public services play a crucial role in society. These services cater directly to the masses. For example, allocating more funding to improve the school system can reduce social problems because educated citizens are more likely to recognize and address societal challenges such as crime or unemployment. Moreover, if the government spends its budget on transportation, it can mitigate the impacts of serious problems such as traffic congestion and pollution. Consequently, funding can be used to build new roads and implement effective regulations.
On the other hand, artistic fields also bring beneficial impacts not only to culture but also to the economy. First, the economic contribution of the arts is considerable. Many fields, such as the movie industry, music, or painting, can generate enormous sums from their products, like songs or films. For instance, many blockbusters, such as those from the Marvel franchise, have earned over one billion dollars. Furthermore, artistic works can preserve cultural identity since many movies or songs reflect the rich traditions and customs of their countries. These products can be passed down to younger generations and preserve cultural heritage.
In conclusion, a sensible strategy should be carried out to balance state funding for both public utilities and the arts because they have positive influences on the economy and citizens’ lives.