One school of thoughts hold that governments should invest ion universe explorationring to find a new life in outer space, while others are of the opinion that they should spend money to solve problems on earth first. This essay will analyze both viewpoints, before concluding that I agree with the latter.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that governments should pay for exploring an alternative place outside Eearth. The key rationale is worldwide population increase consistently and humans have to face with lack of accommodation. Notably, the housing problem may lead to many problems besides being a homeless such as illiteracy and, drug addiction, which tend to be an unstable society. If the public sectors can have alternative strategies for this problem like finding a new place to live in outer space, they can ensure that their residents will have a stable life. Secondly, natural resources are being depleted due to overexploitation. OThe oxygen and water are indiespensible elements for humans in their life cycle;, however, due to the the misuse of forests and water pollution, humans may have to be challenged by serious health problems. Considering these factors, Ccosmo exploration should be invested to find a new space for future human generations.
On the other hand, I am convinced that policymakers should resolve present problems in the earth before exploring new space to live oin other planets. In the financial aspects, planet discovery may need a ton of money, which will cover a majority of national budget. Conversely, with a lot of money is invested, many astronomy instituitions cannot warranty about the results. Worse still, after wasting a lot of the national budget on outer space revelation, they may not find any valuable results, and even if they can find a planet that humans can live oin, it still takes a lot of time and money to settle down in a new place. Beyond the financial aspect, many emergency problems should be found and answered before investing money ion space like public health and, genocide. Instead of finding a place to run away, people should deal with the present problems and fix themit first because it will have life-changing results and may cost a smaller amount of money compared to space exploration.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the reason behind the belief that the state should pay for outer space discovery for an alternative life oin other planets. I would contend that present emergency problems should be tackled before investing in aeronautics and space