In today’s society, more and more students try to have a gap year before going to college. However, some argue that it is more effective to have a work for beginning maturity rather than traveling. From my standpoint, I disagree with that issues, and the essays below will clarify my opinion.
On the one hand, there are good grounds for believing that working experience provide numerous benefits to a student future. First and foremost, students have working background can know deeply about how to work in society. It can be illustrated by the fact that these students easily to push through and figure out how to solve their life’s problem than that with absent of experience. For example, when both students had the same problems, the person with abundance of practice will know exactly what to do faster than the other one. As a result, it cannot debris that working employed experience play a pivotal role in developing their knowledge. On the other hand, I side with those holding the view that travel is one of the best and fastest way to expand their knowledge. Firstly, having an excursion both national and international can help children to gain more observation about the tradition and culture of this country. This mean that every trip will bring them more new things, understandings in life. Another justification for this standpoint is there are plenty of things that can only be learned through voyage, especially when those children travel alone. Moreover, children can know how to live without reliance of parents and teachers, which is a must in their growing up process. For instance, when travel to another culture, they can learn to live in harmony with the other person and broaden their world. Consequently, there is a strong likelihood that travel is indispensable in their adult life.
To summarize, for the all reasons mentions above, it cannot refuse that both agreements have validity; however, it seemm to me that the merits of travel, especially go abroad are overwhelmed than having working acquaintance.