In contemporary societies, a controversial debate has sparked among people as to whether the government should take the responsibility for children’s health-related expenses till their transition into adulthood at the age of 18. Although some might disapprove of this assertion, I firmly agree with the proposed claim. In the upcoming essay, I will elaborate on my perspective, providing several compelling explanations.
First and foremost, covering healthcare expenses of youngsters offers them an equal opportunity to explore their potentials and experience a normal childhood, which is a definite right of all children worldwide, despite their background, religion, and nationality. To begin with, if juveniles do not require to be concerned about the necessary financial resources for their health issues, the likelihood of focusing merely on their aspirations increases. Consequently, they will be able to flourish their hidden talents that may affect them in the future. To illustrate, I have read in an article that Lionel Messi suffered from a serious illness during his childhood and the team he used to play for decided to pay his treatment’s prices. Otherwise, he might not have the chance to become such a prominent football player. Additionally, some diseases have permanent effects on the patient’s physical status if it does not address abruptly, causing permanent disabilities.
Furthermore, not all young people have access to a suitable hospital or health institutions to address their essential demands and being obligated to travel a significant distance to reach one may disturb their education that affects them lifelong. This is a substantial matter since the first two decades of individuals’ lives are required to be dedicated to building the vital foundations for their future career and social status. However, the lack of a desirable health system will postpone this requirement. As a result, those who encounter such challenges will probably face numerous difficulties in finding an appropriate occupation and afford their daily expenses. This phenomenon will cost more for the government and place an excessive burden on the national funds by the increase in poverty and lower workforce.
In conclusion, even though some might assert their disagreement of the fact that the government should address health-related costs of people under 18 years old, I wholeheartedly counter with their disagreement and believe that by covering this expenses both in the visuals and societies will benefit and prevent any undesirable results.