In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate about old cities constructed decades ago as livable buildings, but they are not anymore. Some assert that these buildings must be demolished, as old constructions are not suitable for modern needs. However, I believe local authorities should balance between the preservation of historical cities and the construction of new buildings to address unsafety, lack of prosperity, and loss of character.
The opponents of preservation argue that old-fashioned buildings strain local infrastructure and propose challenges to the residents. Many of these places were designed before the advent of private vehicles and modern transportation systems. Thus, narrow streets and a lack of parking facilities pose issues to mobility and convenience. Similarly, old buildings might not have the possibility of being equipped to handle the needs of a larger population and meet the requirements of modern society. As an illustration, the residents of Vietnam’s cities face challenges in living in unsafe old buildings that can collapse due to the unsustainable design. Furthermore, the congestion of old buildings leads to a lack of prosperity, and, therefore, authorities do not have options to address urban design. However, the proponents of preservation assert that the demolishment of old-fashioned buildings contributes to the loss of historical heritage. Many ancient constructions accommodate a historical interest for residents and tourists; by destroying these buildings, local communities will lose the character of their city. Hence, people should find a balance between the demolition of old buildings and the preservation of urban heritage.
To overcome these challenges, a comprehensive approach from residents and authorities is crucial. Local governments should invest in infrastructure upgrades, such as widening roads, improving public transportation networks, and implementing other ways of commuting, like bike-sharing. By balancing infrastructure development and historical heritage, old towns and cities can adapt to modern demands without compromising their historical value. Unsustainable buildings should be demolished or reconstructed if they do not provide a historical value. Additionally, local communities can also convert old buildings into museums to give them a new life. Hence, although some buildings should be demolished, people can save the city’s character by finding other ways to use old buildings.
In conclusion, by adopting a balanced approach to preservation, investing in infrastructure and accessibility, and fostering local engagement, older cities can overcome challenges and regain livability. I believe a comprehensive effort is necessary to modernize towns and cities without losing their historical value.