In the fast-paced world where human beings are always put into many dilemmas. One of those situations is whether nations with stable economic foundations should support poorer countries without considering any nefarious schemes during disaster or not. In my opinion, I agree that wealthy nations should assist countries with difficult backgrounds because they have a hugeamount of money which can be used to solve serious problems and these supports can act as diplomatic solutions for international unity.
To begin with, wealthy countries have huge abilities for mobilizing capital which can be used to deal with all the challenges caused by natural disasters. According to recent research, rich countries are able to raise internal funding or money and transport money to countries in need many times faster than developing or poor countries without any cumbersome processes . For example, in some Northern European countries which have a huge financial capacity, they usually utilize their money for charity activities in some poor countries during natural disasters.
Besides, humanitarian assistance can be used as a glue to stick relations between countries.When some countries face severe disasters such as tsunami, earthquakes or floods, they need a lot of help from other countries. These are the right times for wealthy nations to send support and ensure a stable recovery afterward. The countries which receive help in the most challenging situations would be very grateful toward the helpers. Due to this, diplomatic relations can be strengthened and improved, the future procedures between those countries will be also accepted quickly because trust has been built.
In conclusion, I agree that rich countries should lend helping hands to poorer countries whenever they suffered from natural disasters because rich countries are able to spend money for solutions easily and they can also gain friendly relations by doing these.