People have different views about whether wild animals should be protected or it is impractical and useless to save wild animals in tiday’s world. I strongly agree with the former view, asserting that wild animals should be preserved.
For a variety of reasons, it would be wrong to say that saving wild animals is a waste of resources in the contemproray world. Firstly, being alive creatures, wild animals should be protected, which means they have the right to live in the globe. Secondly, if the entity were lack of wild animals, it would be monotonous and boring. Take cheetas and tigers, for example, once have been observed growling in their natural habitat, give humans a sense of fulfillment and happiness. So that, in the 21 century, saving wild animals should be instilled into societies, and this value should be the top priority in every region.
On the other hand, some individuals claim that it would be a waste of resources in the 21 century to save wild animals. In other words, having more important concerns such as education, healthcare, and so on, governments in this era should not waste money, energy, and land to protect wild animals. However, I find this argument unconvincing as there is nothing special about the 21 century to allow us to encourage the extinction of wild animals. Furthermore, they are an integral part of a nation’s culture, and they encapsulate the historical and traditional richness of a society. For instance, girraffees and lions are the African symbole.
In conclusion, in my opinion, wild animals should be saved in every era because of having the right to live, and making the world more beautiful. Moreover, each animal is an indispensable part of a nation’s identity.