Band-9 Samples: Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

This post contains ideas and band-9 sample essays for the Cambridge IELTS 17 Academic Writing Task 2 Test 3 topic:

“Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.”

Brainstorming Phases

It’s advisable for you to attempt writing your own essay utilizing these ideas, examples, synonyms, advanced vocabulary, and proposed structures prior to examining any band-9 model essays.

Ideas

Favoring working in the home country:

1. Easing brain drain issues in developing countries.
2. Promoting a sense of national pride and responsibility.
3. Reducing the need for expensive foreign experts.
4. Addressing country-specific issues and challenges.
5. Advancing local research and development initiatives.
6. Fostering knowledge transfer within the community.
7. Increasing accessibility to quality services for citizens.
8. Deepening ties between academia and industry.
9. Inspiring future generations of local professionals.
10. Reinforcing the value of local investment in education.

Favoring working in another country:

1. Enhancing career opportunities and growth.
2. Promoting cultural exchange and understanding.
3. Encouraging the adoption of advanced technologies.
4. Gaining valuable experiences in diverse settings.
5. Enhancing understanding of international standards and regulations.
6. Supporting global efforts in tackling shared challenges.
7. Promoting global citizenship and responsibility.
8. Addressing global skill shortages and demands.
9. Encouraging international collaboration and innovation.
10. Boosting the reputation of home countries abroad.

Real-Life Examples To Make Ideas Clearer

Favoring working in the home country:

1. In Cuba, the country’s impressive healthcare system, which boasts one of the highest life expectancies in Latin America and a low infant mortality rate, can be largely attributed to the dedication of Cuban-trained doctors and healthcare professionals who choose to serve their local communities, thereby directly impacting the wellbeing of their fellow citizens.
2. In 2013, when Typhoon Haiyan struck the Philippines, numerous Filipino professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and engineers who had trained within the country, were instrumental in providing emergency relief and rebuilding efforts.
3. In Japan, a country facing a rapidly aging population, local doctors trained in geriatric care are crucial in addressing the unique healthcare needs of the elderly, enhancing their quality of life, and reducing the strain on the healthcare system.
4. India’s homegrown engineering talents fuel the growth of indigenous technology companies, driving innovation and solidifying the nation’s status as a global tech hub.
5. In South Korea, the rapid development of the country’s robust information technology (IT) sector has been driven by the work of South Korean-trained engineers and professionals, who have chosen to contribute their talents to fuel the nation’s economic growth and global competitiveness in the tech industry.
6. In Nigeria, the “Back to School” initiative, which has significantly increased primary school enrollment rates, can be credited to the efforts of Nigerian-trained educators and administrators who employed their knowledge of local culture, language, and challenges to develop and implement effective strategies, thereby making a lasting impact on the country’s education system.
7. In Singapore, the city-state’s renowned urban planning and public transportation system is the result of the expertise of Singaporean-trained urban planners and engineers who have applied their knowledge of local needs, culture, and geography to create a highly efficient, sustainable, and livable urban environment, improving the quality of life for millions of residents and setting a global standard for urban design.
8. In Taiwan, the successful containment and management of the COVID-19 outbreak can be largely attributed to the swift actions of Taiwanese-trained public health officials and medical professionals, who leveraged their in-depth knowledge of the local healthcare system, cultural practices, and communication channels to implement stringent and effective measures, resulting in a remarkably low infection rate.
9. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, many Indian doctors and healthcare workers who had trained in India chose to remain and serve their communities, significantly contributing to the nation’s ability to manage the crisis and save countless lives.
10. In 2014, Li Kaifu, a former Google China executive, returned to his home country and founded “Innovation Works,” a venture capital firm that has since invested in and nurtured numerous Chinese tech startups, such as the popular short-video platform TikTok, thus contributing significantly to China’s technological advancement and economic growth.

Favoring working in another country:

1. In 2014, the Ebola outbreak in West Africa highlighted the importance of international cooperation, as skilled healthcare professionals from around the world, including doctors and nurses trained in various countries, volunteered to work in affected regions, helping to control the spread of the virus and save countless lives.
2. In 2018, the multinational rescue operation to save the 12 Thai boys and their football coach trapped in the Tham Luang cave showcased the benefits of cross-border collaboration, as expert divers, engineers, and medical personnel from various countries came together to safely extract the team from a perilous situation.
3. In 2020, the rapid development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines were made possible by international collaboration among scientists, pharmaceutical companies, and governments, highlighting the critical need for professionals to work across borders to address global health crises and protect the well-being of people worldwide.
4. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many doctors and healthcare professionals from countries with fewer cases temporarily relocated to severely affected regions, providing much-needed support and expertise to help save lives and alleviate the strain on overwhelmed local healthcare systems.
5. In 2010, following the devastating earthquake in Haiti, skilled engineers and architects from around the globe collaborated to help rebuild the country’s infrastructure, demonstrating the value of international cooperation and knowledge sharing in disaster relief scenarios.
6. The construction of the International Space Station (ISS), which began in 1998 and continues to operate today, represents the cooperative efforts of space agencies from the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan, and Canada, showcasing the extraordinary achievements that can be accomplished when professionals from different countries work together in pursuit of a common goal.
7. In 2005, the global effort to combat the HIV/AIDS pandemic was boosted by the establishment of the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM), which brought together scientists, pharmaceutical experts, and public health professionals from various countries to develop safe, effective, and accessible microbicides to prevent HIV transmission.
8. The global success of the Human Genome Project, completed in 2003, can be attributed to the collaboration of scientists and researchers from multiple countries, who pooled their expertise and resources to map the entire human genome, paving the way for groundbreaking advancements in medicine and genetics.
9. The international effort to combat climate change, as evidenced by the 2015 Paris Agreement, highlights the importance of experts from various countries, such as climate scientists, policymakers, and engineers, working together to develop innovative solutions and strategies to mitigate the impacts of global warming and protect the environment for future generations.
10. The Linux operating system, created by Finnish programmer Linus Torvalds and further developed by thousands of contributors from around the world, exemplifies the power of international collaboration in the realm of open-source software, allowing professionals from different countries to work together to create a reliable, secure, and widely-used operating system that powers a significant portion of the internet and countless devices.

Synonyms To Vary Your Language

Professionals:

1. Practitioners
   • Example: Some argue that practitioners should be obliged to serve in their country of training.
2. Experts
   • Example: Others maintain that experts in various fields should have the freedom to pursue career opportunities in any location they prefer.
3. Specialists
   • Example: Some people assert that specialists should be required to work in their training country.
4. Adepts
   • Example: A group of people believes that adepts in different disciplines should commit to working in the nation where they were trained.
5. Skilled workers
   • Example: Some individuals maintain that skilled workers should be bound to work in the country where they received their education.
6. Competent workers
   • Example: Competent workers should have the freedom to choose where they want to work, as this can lead to a more diverse and globalized workforce.
7. Qualified personnel
   • Example: Some argue that qualified personnel should be allowed to explore opportunities in other countries to broaden their horizons.
8. Accomplished individuals
   • Example: Conversely, some argue that accomplished individuals should not be restricted to working only in their countries of training.
9. Trained workforce
   • Example: Retaining the trained workforce within the country can contribute to the nation’s economic growth and stability.
10. Highly-qualified people
    • Example: Keeping highly-qualified people in their country of training can foster national economic growth and enhance overall stability.

Be required to work in the country where they did their training:

1. Obliged to practice within their training nation
   • Example: Some argue that professionals should be obliged to practice within their training nation, ensuring that the invested resources in their education are utilized for the betterment of the local community.
2. Mandated to serve in the country of their education
   • Example: Others assert that professionals should be mandated to serve in the country of their education, as a means of addressing skill shortages and maintaining a balanced distribution of expertise.
3. Compelled to work in their country of qualification
   • Example: There is a belief that professionals should be compelled to work in their country of qualification, as a way to contribute back to the society that supported their education.
4. Required to remain in their nation of training
   • Example: Some individuals propose that experts should be required to remain in their nation of training, to ensure that they apply their skills and knowledge for the benefit of their home country.
5. Bound to serve in their country of study
   • Example: It is suggested that professionals should be bound to serve in their country of study, as it would help in retaining talents and improving the overall infrastructure of their homeland.
6. Expected to work in the locale of their education
   • Example: Certain people argue that professionals should be expected to work in the locale of their education, so that their expertise is used to address local challenges and contribute to national development.
7. Constrained to practice within their country of training
   • Example: Some believe that it is necessary for professionals to be constrained to practice within their country of training, as it ensures the return on investment made by the state in their education.
8. Held to work in their country of preparation
   • Example: There are those who contend that professionals should be held to work in their country of preparation, in order to foster the growth and development of the local workforce.
9. Restricted to employment within their training jurisdiction
   • Example: Some people maintain that experts should be restricted to employment within their training jurisdiction, as this would encourage the utilization of their skills for the advancement of their home country.
10. Confined to practicing in their nation of education
    • Example: It is posited that professionals should be confined to practicing in their nation of education, ensuring that their valuable expertise remains accessible to the communities that supported their professional growth.

Be free to work in another country if they wish:

1. Permitted to pursue opportunities abroad
   • Example: Conversely, some argue that professionals should be permitted to pursue opportunities abroad if they desire, as this can lead to personal growth and the acquisition of new skills that can be brought back to their home country.
2. Allowed to seek employment internationally
   • Example: Others believe that professionals should be allowed to seek employment internationally if they choose, as this fosters global collaboration and the exchange of ideas, which can ultimately benefit their home country as well.
3. Granted the liberty to work overseas
   • Example: It is also suggested that professionals should be granted the liberty to work overseas if they wish, promoting diversity in the workplace and encouraging the sharing of knowledge across borders.
4. Entitled to explore foreign employment options
   • Example: Some individuals assert that experts should be entitled to explore foreign employment options if they so choose, as this can lead to increased innovation and global cooperation in their respective fields.
5. Unrestricted in pursuing careers globally
   • Example: Certain people argue that professionals should be unrestricted in pursuing careers globally if they desire, as this can lead to a broader understanding of different approaches and subsequent improvements in their home country.
6. Empowered to work in any country of their choice
   • Example: Others advocate that professionals should be empowered to work in any country of their choice, as it can enhance their professional development and contribute to the global exchange of expertise.
7. Granted the autonomy to seek work internationally
   • Example: Some posit that professionals should be granted the autonomy to seek work internationally if they prefer, as this can broaden their perspectives and lead to a more diverse and interconnected global community.
8. Given the freedom to undertake foreign positions
   • Example: It is believed that experts should be given the freedom to undertake foreign positions if they wish, as this fosters personal growth and can bring valuable international experience back to their home country.
9. Accorded the prerogative to work abroad
   • Example: Certain individuals maintain that professionals should be accorded the prerogative to work abroad if they desire, as this promotes the exchange of knowledge and ideas that can benefit both their home country and the international community.
10. Enjoying the right to engage in overseas employment
    • Example: Some argue that professionals should enjoy the right to engage in overseas employment if they choose, as this can lead to enhanced professional skills and a more globalized understanding of their fields.

Advanced Vocabulary

1. Compulsory: required by a rule or law.
   • Example: Some argue that making it compulsory for professionals to work in their country of education would ensure that these nations reap the benefits of their investment in training these specialists.
2. Reciprocity: a mutual exchange of privileges, especially between countries.
   • Example: Implementing a system of reciprocity between countries could alleviate concerns about professionals leaving their training country, as it would promote a balanced exchange of skilled workers.
3. Disenfranchise: to deprive someone of a right or privilege.
   • Example: Critics argue that imposing strict location requirements could disenfranchise professionals, limiting their ability to seek employment in countries where their skills may be in high demand.
4. Autonomy: the right or condition of self-government, especially in a particular sphere.
   • Example: Granting professionals the autonomy to choose their country of employment could lead to a more satisfied and motivated workforce.
5. Retention: the continued possession, use, or control of something.
   • Example: Countries could focus on developing retention strategies to encourage professionals to work within their borders, rather than imposing strict location requirements.
6. Exodus: a large-scale departure or mass movement of people from one location to another, often due to compelling factors such as political, social, or environmental circumstances.
   • Example: The exodus of highly skilled professionals from their home countries in search of better opportunities abroad can lead to a brain drain, leaving the nations struggling to maintain adequate levels of expertise in key sectors like healthcare and engineering.
7. Meritocracy: a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievements.
   • Example: Advocates for a meritocracy argue that individuals should be free to work in any country, as this would ensure that the most talented professionals are rewarded with the best opportunities.
8. Incentivize: to provide someone with an incentive for doing something.
   • Example: Rather than imposing strict location requirements, countries could incentivize professionals to work within their borders by offering attractive benefits and support systems.
9. Equitable: fair and impartial.
   • Example: In conclusion, while ensuring an equitable distribution of skilled professionals within a country is important, it is also crucial to respect individual autonomy and recognize the potential benefits of international experience in today’s globalized world.
10. Patriotism: the affection, loyalty, and dedication one feels towards their country, often demonstrated through support for its values, culture, and overall well-being.
    • Example: Some people argue that requiring professionals to work in the country where they received their training can instill a sense of patriotism, encouraging them to contribute their skills to the betterment of their homeland before seeking opportunities abroad.

Advanced Phrases & Collocations

1. Brain drain: the emigration of highly trained or intelligent people from a particular country.
   • Example: Opponents of such requirements believe that restricting professionals’ mobility could exacerbate the brain drain phenomenon, as skilled workers may choose to pursue their education elsewhere to avoid being bound to one location.
2. Competitive edge: a unique factor that allows a country, organization, or individual to outperform competitors or achieve superior performance in a particular area.
   • Example: By encouraging professionals to work in their home country, local industries have the opportunity to retain a competitive edge, utilizing the skills and knowledge of these individuals for the betterment of the nation.
3. Labor mobility: the ease with which workers can move between jobs, occupations, or geographical locations
   • Example: Opponents of this view argue that labor mobility is vital in today’s interconnected world, and allowing professionals to work in other countries fosters innovation and the exchange of ideas.
4. Societal obligation: a responsibility or duty towards one’s country or community.
   • Example: While some people believe that professionals have a societal obligation to work in the country where they trained, others argue that the freedom to choose their work location can lead to personal and professional growth, which may ultimately benefit their home countries in the long run.
5. Intrinsic motivation: the internal drive or desire to engage in an activity for its own sake, rather than being motivated by external rewards or pressures.
   • Example: Allowing professionals to choose where they work may increase their intrinsic motivation, as they are more likely to be engaged and committed to their work if they have autonomy over their career decisions.
6. Mutual benefit: a situation in which both parties involved gain advantages or positive outcomes from a particular arrangement or cooperation.
   • Example: Encouraging cross-border employment opportunities for professionals can lead to mutual benefit, as it allows for the sharing of knowledge, skills, and best practices between countries, ultimately improving the quality of services and infrastructure globally.
7. Cross-cultural understanding: the ability to recognize, appreciate, and navigate the differences and similarities among various cultures.
   • Example: Those who support the freedom to work abroad highlight the benefits of cross-cultural understanding, as professionals who work in different countries can gain valuable insights, learn new techniques, and bring these experiences back to their home country, ultimately enriching their field of expertise.
8. Talent pool: the supply of skilled professionals available to be hired by organizations or industries.
   • Example: Allowing professionals to work in other countries can help create a more dynamic and diverse global talent pool, which can benefit industries by providing access to a broader range of expertise, perspectives, and problem-solving approaches.
9. Workforce diversity: the presence of a variety of individual characteristics, such as cultural background, gender, age, and professional experience, within a workplace or industry.
   • Example: Encouraging professionals to work in different countries can enhance workforce diversity, which has been shown to improve creativity, innovation, and problem-solving abilities within organizations.
10. Transcending national boundaries: the act of going beyond the limits or borders of one’s country, often in the context of cooperation, exchange, or understanding between people from different nations.
    • Example: Transcending national boundaries enables professionals in various fields to contribute their expertise to countries other than where they received their training.

Suggested Essay Structures

Below are suggested essay structures of various tones.

Structure 1: Neutral

Introduction

• Paraphrase the topic statement.
• Provide a brief overview of the arguments for professionals working in the country where they trained and for professionals working in another country.
• State that the essay will discuss both views impartially, without taking a stance.

Body Paragraph 1: Arguments for professionals working in the country where they trained

• Introduce the main advantage of professionals working in the country where they trained (e.g., economic benefits).
• Provide an example to support the main advantage.
• Introduce a secondary advantage of professionals working in the country where they trained (e.g., addressing shortages in specific sectors).
• Provide an example to support the secondary advantage.

Body Paragraph 2: Arguments for professionals working in another country

• Introduce the main advantage of professionals working in another country (e.g., acquisition of new skills and knowledge).
• Provide an example to support the main advantage.
• Introduce a secondary advantage of professionals working in another country (e.g., fostering cross-cultural understanding).
• Provide an example to support the secondary advantage.

Conclusion

• Reiterate that both perspectives have merits.
• Summarize the main points of both body paragraphs.
• Offer a final thought, emphasizing the importance of societies and governments weighing the pros and cons of each approach to make informed decisions.

Structure 2: Favoring Working In The Home Country

Introduction

• Paraphrase the topic statement.
• Provide a brief overview of the arguments for professionals working in the country where they trained and for professionals working in another country.
• State your own opinion on the issue.

Body Paragraph 1: Advantages of professionals working in the country where they trained

• Introduce the main advantage of professionals working in the country where they trained.
• Elaborate on the main advantage, explaining its significance.
• Introduce a secondary advantage of professionals working in the country where they trained.
• Elaborate on the secondary advantage, explaining its significance.
• Emphasize the positive impact of professionals working in the country where they trained on the local economy and society.

Body Paragraph 2: Addressing the arguments for professionals working in another country

• Acknowledge the main advantage of professionals working in another country.
• Explain the main advantage, but provide a counterargument to demonstrate why it is not as significant as the advantages of working in the country where they trained.
• Reiterate the importance of professionals working in the country where they trained despite the potential benefits of working in another country.

Conclusion

• Reaffirm your opinion on the issue, stating whether you believe professionals should work in the country where they trained or be free to work in another country.
• Summarize the main points of both body paragraphs.
• Offer a final thought or call to action, encouraging societies and governments to consider the implications of professionals working in their home country or abroad to maximize the positive impact on their respective countries.

Structure 3: Favoring Working In Another Country

Introduction

• Paraphrase the topic statement.
• Provide a brief overview of the arguments for professionals working in the country where they trained and for professionals working in another country.
• State your own opinion on the issue, favoring professionals working in another country.

Body Paragraph 1: Advantages of professionals working in another country

• Introduce the main advantage of professionals working in another country.
• Elaborate on the main advantage, explaining its significance.
• Introduce a secondary advantage of professionals working in another country.
• Elaborate on the secondary advantage, explaining its significance.
• Emphasize the positive impact of professionals working in another country on personal growth and global opportunities.

Body Paragraph 2: Addressing the arguments for professionals working in the country where they trained

• Acknowledge the main advantage of professionals working in the country where they trained.
• Explain the main advantage, but provide a counterargument to demonstrate why it is not as significant as the advantages of working in another country.
• Reiterate the importance of professionals exploring international opportunities despite the potential benefits of working in the country where they trained.

Conclusion

• Reaffirm your opinion on the issue, stating that you believe professionals should be free to work in another country if they wish.
• Summarize the main points of both body paragraphs.
• Offer a final thought or call to action, encouraging societies and governments to support professionals seeking opportunities abroad and to foster international collaboration for mutual benefit.

Band-9 Sample Essays

Below are band-9 model essays of various tones and structures.

Sample 1: Neutral

It is often contended that experts in various fields, including medical practitioners and those in the engineering domain, ought to be obliged to practice within their training nation. Conversely, some individuals argue that they should have the liberty to pursue career opportunities in any country they prefer. This essay will delve into both perspectives impartially, without favoring one side over the other.

On one hand, proponents of the notion that professionals should remain in their country of training assert that doing so provides numerous benefits. Primarily, the nation’s economy is bolstered when these highly skilled workers contribute their expertise to local industries. For instance, the proliferation of indigenous technology companies in India can be attributed to the nation’s vast engineering talent pool, which has fostered innovation and economic growth. Additionally, this approach can help alleviate shortages of qualified personnel in certain sectors, such as healthcare. Countries with aging populations, like Japan, rely heavily on their homegrown medical workforce to cater to the needs of their citizens.

Conversely, those who believe that specialists should be accorded the prerogative to work abroad if they desire highlight the advantages of embracing a globalized workforce. Firstly, working in diverse environments can lead to the acquisition of new skills and knowledge, which can then be shared with colleagues upon returning to their home country. For example, a physician who gains experience in cutting-edge surgical techniques abroad can share these methodologies with their peers, ultimately benefiting the entire medical community. Secondly, the exchange of expertise and ideas among specialists from different nations can foster cross-cultural understanding, which is vital in today’s interconnected world. International collaborations in the fields of science and technology, such as the International Space Station, exemplify the potential of transcending national boundaries to achieve remarkable outcomes.

In conclusion, while compelling arguments can be made for both the requirement to work in one’s nation of training and the freedom to pursue opportunities abroad, it is clear that each perspective holds its own merits. It is ultimately up to individual societies and governments to weigh the pros and cons of each approach and implement policies that best serve the needs of their citizens and the global community.

(362 words)

Sample 2: Neutral

In today’s globalized world, labor mobility has become a critical issue, especially regarding highly skilled professionals such as physicians and technicians. The debate revolves around whether these individuals should be subject to compulsory service in the countries where they received their education or granted the freedom to work internationally. This essay will explore both viewpoints and suggest a balanced approach, incorporating the idea of working in the home region for a short period before moving abroad.

Proponents of enforcing a brain drain prevention policy often emphasize the expenditure made by a country in the training of competent workers. For instance, the Cuban healthcare system is renowned worldwide for its excellence and accessibility, in large part due to the government’s commitment to funding medical education. By requiring its doctors to serve the nation’s population, Cuba ensures that its investment is repaid through the provision of high-quality healthcare to its citizens. Moreover, this approach can foster a sense of patriotism and duty among professionals, who may feel a moral obligation to contribute to the development and well-being of their homeland.

On the other end of the spectrum, those who argue for the freedom of accomplished individuals to seek employment opportunities abroad emphasize the potential benefits of global collaboration and knowledge exchange. The extraordinary rescue operation of the twelve Thai boys trapped in a flooded cave in 2018 serves as an exemplar of this perspective. International experts, including engineers, divers, and medical practitioners, pooled their skills and resources to successfully execute the mission, saving the lives of the young soccer team. This example highlights the importance of transcending national boundaries for the greater good.

A balanced approach could involve a short mandatory service within professionals’ home nations before they seek opportunities overseas, ultimately benefiting local development and promoting exposure to diverse experiences. For example, an engineer trained in a developing nation might be required to contribute to local infrastructure projects for a few years before venturing into foreign employment, thereby enhancing domestic progress while acquiring invaluable global insights.

In conclusion, both sides present strong arguments in the discussion about the geographical distribution of competent workers. While making it compulsory for these individuals to work in their home countries can ensure that the investments in their education are returned through the betterment of citizens’ lives, permitting them the freedom to work abroad encourages global collaboration and knowledge sharing. In the end, finding a balance between these two perspectives is crucial for ensuring that countries can develop and prosper in an increasingly interconnected world.

(419 words)

Sample 3: Favoring Working In The Home Country

The escalating demand for skilled workforce, particularly in the fields of medicine and engineering, has stimulated a debate regarding the ethical and practical implications of their migration. Some argue that these experts should be bound to serve in their nation of study, while others advocate for their freedom to pursue opportunities abroad. This essay will examine both perspectives, ultimately contending that professionals should contribute to the development and welfare of the country where they received their training.

Proponents of confining specialists to work in their homeland emphasize the notion of societal obligation. As these individuals have often benefited from state-funded education or subsidized training programs, they have a moral duty to give back to the community that has invested in them. A compelling illustration of this principle is Li Kaifu, a renowned Taiwanese computer scientist who, after studying and working in the United States, returned to Taiwan to establish a venture capital firm aimed at nurturing local talent. By doing so, Li demonstrated his commitment to fostering innovation and economic growth in his homeland.

Another argument in support of this view is the potential for adepts to make a significant impact during times of crisis. The Covid-19 pandemic in Taiwan, for example, highlighted the crucial role that locally trained doctors played in managing and containing the outbreak. Their intrinsic motivation to protect their own communities, coupled with their understanding of the unique social and cultural context, enabled them to implement effective strategies that ultimately saved lives.

On the flip side, those who believe that professionals should be free to work abroad contend that such restrictions could stifle personal growth and limit global collaboration. They argue that by engaging in international endeavors, experts can acquire new skills and knowledge that can, in turn, be applied to benefit their home country upon their return. However, this argument relies on the assumption that these individuals will eventually repatriate and share their expertise, which is not always the case.

In conclusion, although there are valid arguments for allowing highly-qualified people the right to engage in overseas employment, the weight of societal obligation and the potential for tangible impact in their home country should not be overlooked. As such, this essay asserts that professionals ought to prioritize serving the nation where they received their training, as doing so contributes to the betterment of the society that has supported their development.

(395 words)

Sample 4: Favoring Working In The Home Country

It is incontrovertible that the mobility of talented workers, such as physicians and engineers, has become a topic of considerable debate in contemporary society. One school of thought posits that these individuals should be obligated to serve in the nation where they received their education, while detractors argue that they ought to have the autonomy to seek employment abroad as they desire. This essay will elucidate both perspectives, ultimately contending that there is considerable merit in requiring specialists to contribute to the country that has facilitated their training.

Proponents of imposing location requirements often cite the importance of deepening ties between academia and industry. By fostering a symbiotic relationship between educational institutions and the workforce, a nation can establish a robust meritocracy that benefits its citizens. Singapore stands as a prime example of this approach, with its renowned urban planning and public transportation system being a testament to the effectiveness of such a strategy. The government actively supports industry-relevant research and development, thereby empowering local talents to contribute to the nation’s economic growth. This approach not only ensures that experts are retained within the country but also leads to the development of a sustainable and self-sufficient economy.

In contrast, those who advocate for the freedom of adepts to work anywhere they choose often contend that this practice would help to prevent the disenfranchisement of individuals who are unable to secure suitable employment in their home nation. While this argument has some validity, it is essential to bear in mind that the brain drain phenomenon, which results from an exodus of skilled workers, can have deleterious effects on a country’s development. Consequently, allowing unrestricted mobility of qualified personnel could exacerbate existing disparities between countries, further widening the global socioeconomic divide.

In conclusion, although there is a valid argument for professionals to have the liberty to work wherever they please, I firmly believe that requiring them to serve in the region where they received their training is the more judicious approach. This stance not only fosters a meritocratic society but also ensures that the nation’s resources are utilized in a manner that benefits its citizens. By implementing policies that incentivize professionals to contribute to their home country, governments can cultivate a sustainable and self-reliant economy that promotes social and economic development.

(379 words)

Sample 5: Favoring Working In Another Country

The divergent perspectives on whether specialists, such as medical practitioners and engineers, should be compelled to work in their country of qualification, or be allowed to seek employment opportunities overseas, have generated considerable debate. This essay will explore both viewpoints, ultimately advocating for the latter stance.

Firstly, empowering highly capable individuals to explore foreign employment options can significantly enhance the reputation of their home nation on the international stage. When skilled practitioners from a particular region excel in their fields overseas, they inadvertently promote their homeland as a source of top-tier talent. For instance, many Indian software engineers have made remarkable contributions to the tech industry in Silicon Valley, thereby elevating India’s status as a hub of technical expertise.

Moreover, the employment of qualified personnel from various countries in diverse work environments can foster international collaboration, leading to mutual benefits. A salient example of this is the concerted global efforts in combatting the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The pooling of expertise and resources from medical practitioners worldwide undeniably contributed to the swift containment of the epidemic.

Nevertheless, proponents of the view of restricting the free movement of professionals often cite the need for the retention of talent and expertise within a country’s border to ensure its development and prosperity. While this concern is valid, it is essential to consider the potential for knowledge transfer and skill development that arises when experts return to their homeland after gaining experience abroad. This, in turn, can lead to further advancements and growth within their respective fields.

In conclusion, although the need for professionals to contribute to their home country’s development is indisputable, the benefits of allowing them the liberty to work abroad are manifold. Not only does this promote equitable opportunities for personal and professional growth, but it also fosters international collaboration and enhances the global reputation as well as the development of their place of origin.

(315 words)

Sample 6: Favoring Working In Another Country

In an increasingly globalized world, the question of whether professionals such as physicians and engineers ought to be obligated to practice in their country of education or be permitted to venture across borders has become a matter of considerable debate. While some advocate for the former, contending that it is essential for the development of the nation, others argue in favor of the latter, emphasizing the myriad advantages that stem from a diversified workforce. In this essay, I shall analyze both perspectives, ultimately asserting that specialists should have the liberty to seek employment in foreign lands.

To begin with, the proponents of unfettered mobility for accomplished individuals underscore the significance of workforce diversity. By serving in various nations, professionals can encounter novel ideas and methodologies, thereby fostering innovation and efficiency in their respective domains. For instance, the Linux operating system, a groundbreaking software developed by a Finnish programmer, evolved into an international collaboration, with contributions from programmers worldwide. This exemplifies how the exchange of knowledge and expertise transcends national borders and culminates in the development of cutting-edge technology.

Moreover, the rapid distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine on a global scale is another compelling example of the advantages of international cooperation. Medical practitioners and researchers from disparate countries collaborated to expedite the development and dissemination of the vaccine, ultimately combating the pandemic more effectively. This instance highlights the benefits of experts working beyond their home countries and contributing to the greater good of humanity.

Conversely, those asserting that professionals should be mandated to serve in their country of training posit that this would not only preserve precious human capital but also retain the competitive edge of the nation. Oftentimes, developing countries invest significant resources into the education of competent workers, only to witness a large portion of them migrate to more affluent regions in search of better opportunities. To mitigate this issue, a potential solution could entail professionals working in their place of origin for a predetermined period before seeking employment abroad.

In conclusion, while the argument for retaining achieved individuals in their country of education bears merit, their global mobility incentivizes workforce diversity, innovation, and international collaboration, which are indispensable in today’s interconnected world. As such, I firmly believe that professionals should be entitled the autonomy to work in foreign countries, while perhaps considering a temporary commitment to their home nation as a means of contributing to its development.

(399 words)