Band 5+: Has education in your country changed in the last 10 years?

Your pronunciation is average. It is understandable but not always accurate. Focusing on the rhythm and stress patterns of English could prove beneficial.

The response is somewhat relevant to the question but lacks specific details about educational changes. The answer introduces points about international programs and students but doesn't fully explain how education has changed within the country. Consider providing more direct examples of changes in curriculum, teaching methods, or educational policies to strengthen the response.

The response is somewhat coherent, but there are some abrupt shifts in topic. The speaker mentions international programs and deported students, which are related to education but could be linked more smoothly. To improve, focus on maintaining a clear line of thought and using transitional phrases to connect ideas more effectively.

The vocabulary is adequate but not particularly sophisticated. The speaker uses words like 'negative impact' and 'obviously,' which are common but lack precision. To enhance lexical resource, try to incorporate more specific and varied vocabulary related to education and cultural exchange.

There are several grammatical errors, such as 'a lot of things changed' (should be 'have changed') and awkward phrasing like 'cultural educational news.' While the overall meaning is clear, these errors detract from the accuracy. Focus on using correct verb tenses and improving sentence structure.