Honey Bees In Trouble - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Recent Actual Test 4 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Honey Bees in Trouble
Can native pollinators fill the gap?
Recently, ominous headlines have described a mysterious ailment, colony collapse disorder (CCD), which is wiping out the honeybees that pollinate many crops. Without honeybees, the story goes, fields will be sterile, economies will collapse, and food will be scarce.
But what few accounts acknowledge is that what's at risk is not itself a natural state of affairs. For one thing, in the United States, where CCD was first reported and has had its greatest impacts, honeybees are not a native species. Pollination in modern agriculture isn't alchemy, it's industry. The total number of hives involved in the U.S. pollination industry has been somewhere between 2.5 million and 3 million in recent years. Meanwhile, American farmers began using large quantities of organophosphate insecticides, planted large-scale crop monocultures, and adopted "clean farming" practices that scrubbed native vegetation from field margins and roadsides. These practices killed many native bees outright — they're as vulnerable to insecticides as any agricultural pest — and made the agricultural landscape inhospitable to those that remained. Concern about these practices and their effects on pollinators isn't new, in her 1962 ecological alarm cry Silent Spring, Rachel Carson warned of a 'Fruitless Fall' that could result from the disappearance of insect pollinators.
If that 'Fruitless Fall' has not — yet— occurred, it may be largely thanks to the honeybee, which farmers turned to as the ability of wild pollinators to service crops declined. The honeybee has been semi-domesticated since the time of the ancient Egyptians, but it wasn't just familiarity that determined this choice: the bees' biology is in many ways suited to the kind of agricultural system that was emerging. For example, honeybee hives can be closed up and moved out of the way when pesticides are applied to a field. The bees are generalist pollinators, so they can be used to pollinate many different crops. And although they are not the most efficient pollinator of every crop, honeybees have strength in numbers, with 20,000 to 100,000 bees living in a single hive. "Without a doubt, if there was one bee you wanted for agriculture, it would be the honeybee," says Jim Cane, of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The honeybee, in other words, has become a crucial cog in the modern system of industrial agriculture. That system delivers more food, and more kinds of it, to more places, more cheaply than ever before. But that system is also vulnerable, because making a farm field into the photosynthetic equivalent of a factory floor, and pollination into a series of continent-long assembly lines, also leaches out some of the resilience characteristic of natural ecosystems.
Breno Freitas, an agronomist in Brazil, pointed out that in nature such a high degree of specialisation usually is a very dangerous game: it works well while all the rest is in equilibrium, but runs quickly to extinction at the least disbalance. In effect, by developing an agricultural system that is heavily reliant on a single pollinator species, we humans have become riskily overspecialised. And when the human-honeybee relationship is disrupted, as it has been by colony collapse disorder, the vulnerability of that agricultural system begins to become clear.
In fact, a few wild bees are already being successfully managed for crop pollination. "The problem is trying to provide native bees in adequate numbers on a reliable basis in a fairly short number of years in order to service the crop," Jim Cane says. "You're talking millions of flowers per acre in a two-to three-week time frame, or less, for a lot of crops." On the other hand, native bees can be much more efficient pollinators of certain crops than honeybees, so you don't need as many to do the job. For example, about 750 blue orchard bees (Osmia lignaria) can pollinate a hectare of apples or almonds, a task that would require roughly 50,000 to 150,000 honeybees. There are bee tinkerers engaged in similar work in many corners of the world. In Brazil, Breno Freitas has found that Centris tarsata, the native pollinator of wild cashew, can survive in commercial cashew orchards if growers provide a source of floral oils, such as by interplanting their cashew trees with Caribbean cherry.
In certain places, native bees may already be doing more than they're getting credit for. Ecologist Rachael Winfree recently led a team that looked at pollination of four summer crops (tomato, watermelon, peppers, and muskmelon) at 29 farms in the region of New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Winfree's team identified 54 species of wild bees that visited these crops, and found that wild bees were the most important pollinators in the system: even though managed honeybees were present on many of the farms, wild bees were responsible for 62 percent of flower visits in the study. In another study focusing specifically on watermelon, Winfree and her colleagues calculated that native bees alone could provide sufficient pollination at 90 percent of the 23 farms studied. By contrast, honeybees alone could provide sufficient pollination at only 78 percent of farms.
"The region I work in is not typical of the way most food is produced," Winfree admits. In the Delaware Valley, most farms and farm fields are relatively small, each farmer typically grows a variety of crops, and farms are interspersed with suburbs and other types of land use which means there are opportunities for homeowners to get involved in bee conservation, too. The landscape is a bee-friendly patchwork that provides a variety of nesting habitat and floral resources distributed among different kinds of crops, weedy field margins, fallow. fields, suburban neighborhoods, and semi natural habitat like old woodlots, all at a relatively small scale. In other words, "pollinator-friendly" farming practices would not only aid pollination of agricultural crops, but also serve as a key element in the over all conservation strategy for wild pollinators, and often aid other wild species as well.
Of course, not all farmers will be able to implement all of these practices. And researchers are suggesting a shift to a kind of polyglot agricultural system. For some small-scale farms, native bees may indeed be all that's needed. For larger operations, a suite of managed bees — with honeybees filling the generalist role and other, native bees pollinating specific crops — could be augmented by free pollination services from resurgent wild pollinators. In other words, they're saying, we still have an opportunity to replace a risky monoculture with something diverse, resilient, and robust.
Questions
Questions 27–30 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
Write
YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Questions 31–35 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Questions 36–40 Matching Sentence Endings
Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-F, below.
A. native pollinators can survive when a specific plant is supplied.
B. it would cause severe consequences to both commerce and agriculture.
C. honeybees can not be bred.
D. some agricultural landscapes are favourable in supporting wild bees.
E. a large scale of honeybees are needed to pollinate.
F. an agricultural system is fragile when relying on a single pollinator.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | YES | The total number of hives involved in the U.S. pollination industry has been somewhere between 2.5 million and 3 million in recent years | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in the United States, from 2.5 million to 3 million honeybee homes (hives) have been used for helping plants grow in farms, and this has been true in the last few years. Answer Explanation: The answer is YES. This means the writer agrees that farmers in the United States have been using many honeybees in the last few years. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage clearly states that a very large number of honeybee hives have been used in farming in the United States 'in recent years'. It mentions that millions of honeybee hives are part of the 'U.S. pollination industry', which means farmers rely on them a lot. |
| Q28 | NOT GIVEN | Meanwhile, American farmers began using large quantities of organophosphate insecticides, planted large-scale crop monocultures, and adopted "clean farming" practices that scrubbed native vegetation from field margins and roadsides. These practices killed many native bees outright — they're as vulnerable to insecticides as any agricultural pest — and made the agricultural landscape inhospitable to those that remained | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that farmers started using 'clean farming' methods. These methods involved removing plants from the edges of fields and roads. The passage states that these practices, along with using bug sprays and planting only one type of crop, harmed many wild bees and made the land unfriendly for the bees that were left. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NOT GIVEN' means that the passage does not tell us if clean farming practices are bad for farmers' health. The text does not talk about this topic at all. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NOT GIVEN' because the passage only talks about how 'clean farming practices' hurt native bees and changed the farm land. It says these practices 'scrubbed native vegetation from field margins and roadsides' and 'killed many native bees'. However, the passage does not mention anything about how these practices affect the 'health' of the farmers themselves. There is no information in the text to say if clean farming is harmful to farmers' health or not. |
| Q29 | NO | For example, about 750 blue orchard bees (Osmia lignaria) can pollinate a hectare of apples or almonds, a task that would require roughly 50,000 to 150,000 honeybees | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that a small number of blue orchard bees can pollinate apples and almonds very well. It shows they are good for these *specific* fruits, but it does not say they are the *best* for *all* different plants. Answer Explanation: The answer 'NO' means that the statement is not true. The passage does not claim that blue orchard bees are the best pollinators for all types of crops. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NO' because the passage specifically states that blue orchard bees are very efficient pollinators for *certain crops*, such as 'apples or almonds'. The passage does not say they are 'the most efficient pollinator for every crop.' This means the statement makes a claim that is too broad and unsupported by the text. |
| Q30 | YES | In other words, "pollinator-friendly" farming practices would not only aid pollination of agricultural crops, but also serve as a key element in the over all conservation strategy for wild pollinators, and often aid other wild species as well | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that farming methods that help pollinators like native bees also help the bees pollinate crops. But it also says that these methods are a big part of saving wild pollinators in general, and they 'often aid other wild species as well,' meaning they help other types of wild animals and plants too. Answer Explanation: The answer, 'YES', means that the writer of the text believes it is good for other local animals and plants if we protect native bees. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage explicitly states that actions taken to help native bees, such as 'pollinator-friendly' farming, are also good for 'other wild species'. This means that protecting native bees has a positive impact on other local animals and plants. |
| Q31 | B | in her 1962 ecological alarm cry Silent Spring, Rachel Carson warned of a 'Fruitless Fall' that could result from the disappearance of insect pollinators | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Rachel Carson, in her book 'Silent Spring', warned about a 'Fruitless Fall'. This means a time when there would be no fruit because the insects that pollinate plants have gone away. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the writer is talking about the bad things that happen when there are no more insects to help plants grow food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage mentions Rachel Carson's warning of a 'Fruitless Fall' specifically linking it to the 'disappearance of insect pollinators'. This phrase highlights the negative 'impacts' or consequences that would occur if insects like bees, which are essential for pollination, were to disappear. The writer uses this example to show how serious the problem of losing these insects is for agriculture. |
| Q32 | C | For example, honeybee hives can be closed up and moved out of the way when pesticides are applied to a field | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that, for example, honeybee homes (hives) can be shut tightly and taken away from the fields when farmers spray chemicals (pesticides) on the crops. Answer Explanation: The answer means that honeybee homes, called hives, can be kept safe when farmers spray chemicals (pesticides) on their fields to kill bad insects. They can be moved out of the way. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the passage explains that honeybees are good for modern farming because their homes (hives) can be protected from chemicals used on crops. The text mentions that 'the bees' biology is in many ways suited to the kind of agricultural system that was emerging.' One specific reason given is about how they deal with pesticides, which are chemicals used in farming. |
| Q33 | A | But that system is also vulnerable, because making a farm field into the photosynthetic equivalent of a factory floor, and pollination into a series of continent-long assembly lines, also leaches out some of the resilience characteristic of natural ecosystems | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage means that when farming is made to be like a factory or a long production line, it becomes weak and can be easily damaged. It loses the natural strength and ability to recover that natural places have. Answer Explanation: The answer means one bad or negative thing about the modern way of farming that uses machines and big systems. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the writer uses the words 'factory' and 'assembly lines' to show a problem with the modern farming system. The passage explains that turning farms into something like a 'factory floor' and pollination into 'assembly lines' makes the system lose its natural ability to be strong and bounce back from problems. This 'vulnerability' is a clear drawback or disadvantage of how industrial agriculture works. |
| Q34 | D | In another study focusing specifically on watermelon, Winfree and her colleagues calculated that native bees alone could provide sufficient pollination at 90 percent of the 23 farms studied. By contrast, honeybees alone could provide sufficient pollination at only 78 percent of farms | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that in a special study about watermelon farms, native bees were able to pollinate enough plants in 90 out of every 100 farms. But honeybees could only do the same for 78 out of every 100 farms. This means native bees were better at pollinating watermelon plants in more places. Answer Explanation: The answer shows that, in some situations, wild bees do a better job of pollinating plants than honeybees. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer states that wild bees are more efficient, meaning they do a better job, than honeybees in certain situations. The passage supports this by comparing how well native bees and honeybees pollinate watermelon crops. It says that wild bees provided enough pollination for 90% of the farms, while honeybees only did so for 78% of the farms. This clearly shows that wild bees were more effective in these specific examples. |
| Q35 | B | For some small-scale farms, native bees may indeed be all that's needed. For larger operations, a suite of managed bees — with honeybees filling the generalist role and other, native bees pollinating specific crops — could be augmented by free pollination services from resurgent wild pollinators | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that small farms might only need local, wild bees. For bigger farms, a plan to use a mix of bees — honeybees for general work and other local bees for special crops — could be used. This shows different types of bees are suggested for different farm sizes. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the writer wants to suggest using different kinds of bees for different sizes of farms to help crops grow. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer states that the writer suggests using different types of bees for various farm sizes. The last paragraph clearly explains this by saying 'researchers are suggesting a shift to a kind of polyglot agricultural system.' It then gives examples: 'For some small-scale farms, native bees may indeed be all that's needed.' And for 'larger operations, a suite of managed bees — with honeybees filling the generalist role and other, native bees pollinating specific crops.' This shows a strategy of adopting different bees based on the farm's size and needs, moving towards a 'diverse, resilient, and robust' system. |
| Q36 | B | Without honeybees, the story goes, fields will be sterile, economies will collapse, and food will be scarce | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if honeybees are gone, farms will not grow crops (fields will be sterile), businesses will fail (economies will collapse), and there will not be enough to eat (food will be scarce). This shows how bad the problems would be. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the news headlines about colony collapse disorder say that if honeybees disappear, it will cause very bad problems for both business (commerce) and farming (agriculture). Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage clearly states what the 'ominous headlines' describe as the consequences of colony collapse disorder. It mentions that 'Without honeybees, the story goes, fields will be sterile, economies will collapse, and food will be scarce.' These phrases indicate severe negative impacts on agriculture (sterile fields, scarce food) and commerce (economies will collapse). |
| Q37 | F | In effect, by developing an agricultural system that is heavily reliant on a single pollinator species, we humans have become riskily overspecialised. And when the human-honeybee relationship is disrupted, as it has been by colony collapse disorder, the vulnerability of that agricultural system begins to become clear | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when we create a farming method that relies too much on just one kind of pollinator, like honeybees, we make it very risky and not strong. It then says that if something bad happens to this important pollinator, such as diseases harming honeybees, the weaknesses of that farming system start to show clearly. Answer Explanation: The answer means that a farming system becomes weak and easily broken if it depends only on one type of insect or animal, like a bee, to pollinate all its crops. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer, F, is supported by Breno Freitas's viewpoint, which is explained in the passage. Freitas points out that relying too much on one specific thing, called 'specialisation', is 'a very dangerous game'. The passage then connects this idea to farming, stating that 'by developing an agricultural system that is heavily reliant on a single pollinator species, we humans have become riskily overspecialised.' This means that such a system is not strong or 'fragile', and its 'vulnerability' becomes clear when problems like 'colony collapse disorder' affect the single pollinator. |
| Q38 | E | For example, about 750 blue orchard bees (Osmia lignaria) can pollinate a hectare of apples or almonds, a task that would require roughly 50,000 to 150,000 honeybees | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if you want to pollinate a field of apples or almonds, you would need around 750 blue orchard bees. But, if you only had honeybees, you would need a much bigger group, from 50,000 to 150,000 of them, to do the same amount of work. Answer Explanation: The answer means that to pollinate plants, many honeybees are usually required. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because the passage uses blue orchard bees as an example to highlight the large number of honeybees needed for pollination. It states that while 750 blue orchard bees can pollinate a certain area, a much larger quantity—between 50,000 to 150,000 honeybees—would be needed to do the same job. This comparison clearly shows that 'a large scale of honeybees are needed to pollinate' crops. |
| Q39 | A | In Brazil, Breno Freitas has found that Centris tarsata, the native pollinator of wild cashew, can survive in commercial cashew orchards if growers provide a source of floral oils, such as by interplanting their cashew trees with Caribbean cherry | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in Brazil, a scientist named Breno Freitas learned that a native bee, Centris tarsata, can live on cashew farms if the farmers plant 'Caribbean cherry' trees. These cherry trees give the bees the special 'floral oils' they need to live. Answer Explanation: The answer means that certain wild bees can stay alive if farmers give them a special kind of plant that they need. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the passage explains how Centris tarsata, a native pollinator bee, can live in farms if growers plant another specific plant, the Caribbean cherry. This 'specific plant' helps the bee by providing 'floral oils' that it needs to survive. So, the example shows that native pollinators can indeed survive when a particular plant is provided as a resource. |
| Q40 | D | The landscape is a bee-friendly patchwork that provides a variety of nesting habitat and floral resources distributed among different kinds of crops, weedy field margins, fallow. fields, suburban neighborhoods, and semi natural habitat like old woodlots, all at a relatively small scale | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the natural environment in that area is like a mix of different good things for bees. It gives them many different places to build homes and lots of food, like flowers, in small farms, grassy edges, empty fields, living areas, and small natural forest parts. Answer Explanation: The answer says that the research in Delaware Valley shows that some farm areas are good for helping wild bees to live there. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the passage describes the Delaware Valley as having a special kind of landscape that is very 'bee-friendly'. This landscape helps wild bees by offering many places for them to live and find food, which means it supports them well. The text uses phrases like 'bee-friendly patchwork' and mentions 'nesting habitat and floral resources' to explain why it's good for bees. |
