Biofuels: Are They The Fuels Of The Future? - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Trainer 2 Academic Reading Test 6 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
Biofuels: are they the fuels of the future?
A On paper, biofuels seem the ideal replacement for oil, coal and gas, the fossil fuels we depend upon, and which drive global warming and disrupt weather patterns by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. But the past decade has seen the biofuel industry face tough questions over whether it can truly claim to be 'green'. One of the biggest criticisms of biofuel crops – at least those that produce the fuel ethanol – has been their impact on food markets and on traditional land use. Direct impacts – for example cutting forests to make way for a biofuel crop – are usually obvious, says Professor Bill Laurance, director of the Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science at James Cook University. But, in his experience, indirect impacts can be no less devastation for the environment and are far more of a challenge to anticipate.
B Let's take Brazil, for example. When farmers in the US opted out of soy in favour of corn as a biofuel crop, soy prices soared, suddenly making it an attractive crop for Brazilian farmers. In turn, this increased demand for freshly deforested cropland in Brazil. Similar situations are occurring all over the world. But while deforestation can certainly lead to economic benefits for farmers, it also puts biodiversity at risk. Then, once a biofuel crop has been planted on deforestation land, farmers need to ensure that it grows as well as it can. That means applying large quantities of fertilizer, and while this helps the plants to shoot up, there is also the possibility it will lead to the contamination of local rivers.
C Not all biofuels have been grown on land, but the once-popular idea of generating them from microscopic algae grown in ponds or tanks has largely been forgotten. Professor Rachel Burton, leader of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Cell Walls at the University of Adelaide, thinks that there is a smarter way forward for biofuels and it starts with selecting the right crop for land not usually used for agriculture. Burton and others are looking to tough plants that grow on land too dry or salty for conventional crops. Australia, for example, could turn to crops such as agave, hemp or the native saltbush and wild-growing sorghum for the biofuels of the future, she says.
D Researchers must also consider economic factors, however. While plant oils can be extracted and turned into biodiesel for vehicles and machinery, currently the process is very expensive – much more so than the process for fossil fuels. Dr Allan Green is innovation leader for bio-based products at CSIRO Agriculture and Food. His solution is to make plants oilier by genetically altering them so that they produce oil in their leaves, not just in their fruit or seeds. With more oil being produced on a particular section of land by the same number of plants, it would become cheaper to harvest and extract the oil. The technology, which has so far only been tested in tobacco, shows that oil production can be boosted to a third or more of a tobacco leaf's weight. If used in a different crop- one that already produces oil in its seeds or fruit – the hope is that oil output could be doubled, though that idea is yet to be put to the test.
E A technology which is becoming increasingly popular in the biofuel industry is hydrothermal liquefaction. This is a process which uses heat and pressure to break apart molecules in whole plants and remove oxygen, so that the raw material is turned to refine the crude oil is also refined. After this, it can then be turned into different kinds of fuel. One advantage of the hydrothermal liquefaction process is that many kinds of plant can be used. And if this process could run on energy from solar panels or wind farms, it would be much more environmentally sustainable.
F New processing technologies are giving biofuel producers hope that, in future, they won't be limited to plants designed to be biofuel-only crops. Perhaps they will be able to choose species that deliver added benefits or sources of income. Hemp crops, for instance, could be used for their oil, but also for their fibre. Some car manufacturers have already used it as a soundproofing material in their vehicles, and others may do the same. And according to Kristen Heimann, associate professor at the College of Science and Engineering at James Cook University, it might be impossible, say, for algae not just to act as a biofuel, but to decontaminate water. Burton believes this kind of multi-purpose use for biofuel crops is the way forward. 'It's much more sophisticated thinking', she says. 'Biofuels maybe don't need to be as cheap as we think they do, because you can make money out of the other things'. Eventually, the biofuel industry could well develop into a very diverse one, with no one crop or process domination the market, according to Green. 'The amount of fuel we need to move away from petroleum is massive, so there's plenty of space for all technologies', he says.
Questions
Questions 14–19 Matching Information
Reading Passage 2 has six paragraphs, A-F.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Questions 20–23 Matching Features
Look at the following statements and the list of researchers below.
Match each statement with the correct researcher, A, B or C.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
A. Professor Bill Laurance
B. Professor Rachel Burton
C. Dr Allan Green
Questions 24–26 Sentence Completion
Complete the sentences below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
- The decision by US farmers to grow 24 had an effect on land in Brazil.
- 25 is threatened when trees are cut down so crops can be planted.
- Rivers may be polluted by the 26 that farmers use on biofuel crops.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | D | If used in a different crop- one that already produces oil in its seeds or fruit – the hope is that oil output could be doubled, though that idea is yet to be put to the test | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that while researchers believe they can double the amount of oil a plant produces, they have not actually performed the experiment to show that it works. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph D because it describes a scientific idea for increasing oil in plants that no one has tried to prove in a real test yet. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Paragraph D because it discusses Dr. Allan Green’s theory on genetically modifying plants to produce more oil. The paragraph mentions a specific "hope" that oil production in certain crops could be doubled. However, it explicitly states that this "idea is yet to be put to the test," which matches the requirement for a theory that "must still be proved." |
| Q15 | E | This is a process which uses heat and pressure to break apart molecules in whole plants and remove oxygen, so that the raw material is turned to refine the crude oil is also refined. After this, it can then be turned into different kinds of fuel | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains a method for making fuel by using heat and pressure on plants to change them into oil, which can then be made into various types of fuel. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph E because it describes the steps used in a specific way to make fuel. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is paragraph E because it explains a specific manufacturing method called hydrothermal liquefaction. It outlines several steps or 'stages' in the process: first, using heat and pressure to break molecules and remove oxygen, next turning the material into crude oil, and finally refining it into different types of fuel. Key words such as 'process' and 'turned into' indicate a sequence of stages being followed. |
| Q16 | F | Hemp crops, for instance, could be used for their oil, but also for their fibre. Some car manufacturers have already used it as a soundproofing material in their vehicles, and others may do the same. And according to Kristen Heimann, associate professor at the College of Science and Engineering at James Cook University, it might be impossible, say, for algae not just to act as a biofuel, but to decontaminate water | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that hemp can be used for its oil and its strong parts (fibre) to stop noise in cars, and it suggests that algae might be used for cleaning water as well as for fuel. Answer Explanation: The answer is Paragraph F because it discusses how certain plants can be used for things other than just making fuel. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Paragraph F because it mentions "added benefits" and "multi-purpose use" for plants grown for fuel. It provides specific examples: hemp can provide fiber for car soundproofing, and algae could be used to clean water. These are clear examples of jobs these plants can do that are separate from providing energy. |
| Q17 | A | fossil fuels we depend upon, and which drive global warming and disrupt weather patterns by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that fossil fuels make the planet hotter and change the weather because they put a gas called carbon dioxide into the air. Answer Explanation: The answer is Paragraph A, which describes how using fuels like oil and coal is bad for the earth. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Paragraph A because it explains that fossil fuels cause problems like global warming and change weather patterns. It specifies that these fuels do harm by letting carbon dioxide into the air. This matches the question's request for an explanation of how fossil fuel use harms the environment. |
| Q18 | C | Not all biofuels have been grown on land, but the once-popular idea of generating them from microscopic algae grown in ponds or tanks has largely been forgotten | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that researchers used to think making fuel from tiny water plants (algae) in tanks was a good idea, but now that method is mostly ignored or not used anymore. Answer Explanation: The answer is paragraph C. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is paragraph C because it mentions a specific method—growing microscopic algae in ponds or tanks—that was once common but is no longer popular. The phrase 'largely been forgotten' is a synonym for the idea that this production method has been abandoned by most people in the industry. |
| Q19 | D | While plant oils can be extracted and turned into biodiesel for vehicles and machinery, currently the process is very expensive – much more so than the process for fossil fuels | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that even though we can make fuel from plants, it costs a lot more money to do this than it does to make fuel from sources like oil or coal. Answer Explanation: The answer is Paragraph D because it explains that making fuel from plants is currently more expensive than making it from oil or gas. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Paragraph D because it highlights the economic challenge of biofuels. It explicitly compares the cost (expense) of turning plant oils into biodiesel with the cost of producing fossil fuels. Using keywords like 'expensive' and 'much more so than', it shows that biofuels have a higher production cost than other energy sources at this time. |
| Q20 | B | Burton believes this kind of multi-purpose use for biofuel crops is the way forward. 'It's much more sophisticated thinking', she says. 'Biofuels maybe don't need to be as cheap as we think they do, because you can make money out of the other things' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Professor Burton supports the idea of using crops for many different tasks at once. She explains that the fuel does not have to be sold at a low price to be successful, because the producer can sell other parts of the plant to make a profit. Answer Explanation: The answer is Professor Rachel Burton, because she thinks that using crops for more than one purpose can help make the fuel business more profitable. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the passage describes Professor Rachel Burton's view on 'multi-purpose use' for plants used as fuel. She argues that even if the fuel itself is not very cheap, the process can still be beneficial for the economy because companies can earn additional 'money' or 'income' from the 'other things' (other products) made from the same plant. This matches the idea of being 'cost-effective' by using a 'range of products'. |
| Q21 | A | But, in his experience, indirect impacts can be no less devastation for the environment and are far more of a challenge to anticipate | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that indirect effects on nature can be very bad and are much harder to guess or plan for in advance. Answer Explanation: The answer is Professor Bill Laurance. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Professor Bill Laurance because Paragraph A explains his view on the environment. He mentions that while direct impacts (like cutting down trees for crops) are easy to see, the "indirect impacts" (hidden or side effects) are much harder to know about beforehand. The word "anticipate" in the text is a synonym for "predict" in the question, showing that these effects are difficult to expect or see coming. |
| Q22 | C | Eventually, the biofuel industry could well develop into a very diverse one, with no one crop or process domination the market, according to Green. 'The amount of fuel we need to move away from petroleum is massive, so there's plenty of space for all technologies', he says | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Dr. Green thinks the future of biofuels will have many different kinds. He believes that no single plant or method will take over the whole market. Instead, because humans need a huge amount of fuel to stop using oil, there is room for many different ways and many different plants to be used at once. Answer Explanation: The answer is Dr. Allan Green, represented by choice C. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Dr. Green explains that the future of the fuel industry will be very 'diverse,' meaning it will include many different types of plants and methods. He points out that because we need such a large amount of fuel to replace oil (petroleum), there is 'plenty of space' for every different technology to be used. This supports the idea that a variety of crops and processes will be necessary. |
| Q23 | B | Burton and others are looking to tough plants that grow on land too dry or salty for conventional crops | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Professor Burton is researching strong plants that can live in environments like dry deserts or salty soil, which are usually not good for regular farming. Answer Explanation: The answer is Professor Rachel Burton, who is the researcher labeled as 'B'. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Professor Burton suggests that we should use plants that are strong enough to grow in places where normal farm plants cannot survive. She mentions using land that is very dry or has a lot of salt. These are synonyms for 'difficult environmental conditions.' |
| Q24 | corn | When farmers in the US opted out of soy in favour of corn as a biofuel crop, soy prices soared, suddenly making it an attractive crop for Brazilian farmers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that when farmers in America stopped growing soy and started growing corn to make fuel, the price of soy went up a lot. Because of this, farmers in Brazil wanted to grow more soy. Answer Explanation: The answer is corn, which is a type of crop that US farmers chose to grow to make fuel. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is corn because the passage explains that when farmers in the US decided to grow corn instead of soy, it caused the price of soy to go up. This change in the market influenced farmers in Brazil to clear more land (deforest) to grow soy there. Therefore, the US farmers' choice to plant corn had a direct impact on land use in Brazil. The word 'corn' fits the sentence as the specific crop chosen by the US farmers. |
| Q25 | Biodiversity | But while deforestation can certainly lead to economic benefits for farmers, it also puts biodiversity at risk | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that although cutting down trees can help farmers make more money, it also endangers the variety of plants and animals living in that environment. Answer Explanation: The answer "Biodiversity" refers to all the different types of animals, plants, and other living things that exist in a specific area or in the world. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "Biodiversity" because the text mentions that when forests are cut down (deforestation) to create space for crops, it creates a danger for local nature. The text uses the phrase "puts biodiversity at risk," which directly matches the idea of biodiversity being "threatened." |
| Q26 | fertiliser / fertilizer | That means applying large quantities of fertilizer, and while this helps the plants to shoot up, there is also the possibility it will lead to the contamination of local rivers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that farmers use a lot of food for plants to make them grow quickly. However, this plant food can get into nearby rivers and make the water dirty or harmful. Answer Explanation: The answer 'fertiliser' refers to a substance, such as chemicals or nutrients, that farmers add to the soil or plants to help them grow faster and healthier. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'fertiliser' because the passage explains that farmers use 'large quantities' of it to ensure biofuel crops grow well. It specifically warns that using this substance can lead to the 'contamination' (pollution) of nearby 'rivers,' which matches the information in the sentence. Note that 'contamination' is a synonym for 'polluted' used in the question. |
