In current scenario, busy from the daily constraints of life , people do spare some time for recreational activities such as indulging in various physical activities or sports. Few people hold a perception that hazardous sports activities should not be legalised by the authorities. On the contrary, others hold a view that they should have liberty to choose the activity based on their own preferences. Let us substantiate both the viewpoints to reach a reasonable inference.
To begin with, there are my-raid cons associated with these harmful sports. To actuate, the most intrinsic is that it might prove to be fatal for the health as I can lead to several incurable injuries . Playing adventurous sports like Sky Diving, Wrestling, Boxing etc may lead to bone and joint dislocations . For instance, athletes performing rigorous sports skills end up hurting themselves so vigorously that it turns out into lifetime disability in few cases.
However, One can not neglect the fact that India is a democratic country therefore everyone out there has right to freedom of what they want to choose. So, choosing what sport an individual should play should be entirely left on there will as the sportsperson are deliberately aware of all the risks associated with the respective sport . For instance, a person can injured even if he or she is driving a car so sports are not the mere reason for these mis-happenings
In conclusion , I would like to say that both the stances have their own merits and demerits associated with them . However, I favour the later idea as I feel in this modern era, people are more intellectual and can make their own choices be it sports related on any other concerning field