IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 Report Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your IELTS Academic task 1 report (bar chart, line graph, table, pie chart, process diagram, map, multiple graphs) with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 letter checker/writing task 2 checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 1 reports written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Report Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 Report Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 Report Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This impressive online tool provides instant, accurate, and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS reports, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in IELTS Academic. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
Experience the future of IELTS test preparation today – try our innovative IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 Report Checker now!
The given chart shows the effects of clear-cutting of forests.
Overall, the diagram consists of several stages, beginning with the deterioration of the soil and increased risk of burning and ending with the advent of natural disasters.
The first consequence is that the soil is compressed due to heavy logging equipment. Subsequently, the ground becomes ‘baked’, so the rainwater runs off. This leads to the emergence of flooding. The second effect is that fewer roots hold the top layer of soil in place. This causes the topsoil to be undermined, so the vegetation is degraded.
The third consequence is that deforestation can increase the risk of combustion. Meanwhile, remains of wood from logging are damaged; therefore, the feeding opportunity for micro-organisms is reduced. Vegetation is deteriorating due to pioneer species moving in. This leads to biodiversity decreasing. The final effect is that plants return less humidity to the air, which is why atmospheric precipitation is reduced. This causes droughts to grow, so the flora is degraded.
Band 9
why is the data and picture give different information
The graph illustrates the percentage of Australian exports going to four selected countries over the period from 1990 to 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that there are upward trends in the export capacity to China and India, whereas the amount of exported products from Australia to the USA and Japan has declined over the period.
Looking at the details, as regards China, the percentage stood at approximately 3% in 1990, and this was followed by a gradual increase over the ten-year period from 3% to 5%. Subsequently, the number rose considerably from 5% to 25% between 2000 and 2010, and then finished at approximately 28%, which was the highest point among the other figures in 2012. If we look at India, the figure levelled off at around 1.5% in the first decade, but then experienced a significant rise to around 7% between 2000 and 2010. Finally, after a small decrease, it stopped at 5% in 2012.
By contrast, as for Japan, the number started at roughly 26%, which was the highest point in the beginning among the other numbers in 1990, and this was followed by a gradual fall to around 18% from 1995 to 2010, then the figure remained stable over the next two years. With respect to the USA, the figure stood at roughly 12%, but then fluctuated between around 7% and 13% in the first decade. Next, there was a gradual reduction to 5% from 2000 to 2010, but this was followed by a slight rise to 7% in the next two years.
#uzbekistan #band-9
The line graph below elucidates the amount of water used globally for various reasons, while the table compares water use per capita in two different countries, Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Units are presented in km³ and m³, respectively.
Overall, all sectors have shown an increasing tendency over the period, with agriculture remaining the dominant sector. In the given table, we can see that water consumption per person in Brazil was far more intensive than in Congo.
At the beginning, in 1900, we can see from the line graph that approximately 500 km³ of water worldwide was used for agriculture, while water use for domestic and industrial purposes was equally a bit more than 20 km³. In contrast, by the year 2000, agriculture used 3000 km³ of water, while the amount of water used for industrial purposes totaled around 1200 km³ and usage of water for domestic purposes was about 500 km³.
The accompanying table illustrates a significant gap in water consumption per person in two different countries. Brazil, with a population around 176 million and 26,500 km² of irrigated areas, consumed 359 m³ of water per capita; conversely, Congo, with a 5.2 million population and 265 times fewer irrigated territories, consumed 8 m³ of water per individual.
The bar chart below describes the world production output from several continents: Asia, Europe, and the rest of the world, in separate years.
Overall, at the beginning, Asia was leading in production output percentage, and Europe was a bit less productive than Asia; meanwhile, the rest of the world produced an insignificant output. By the end, the rest of the world’s production overtook Europe, but Asia was still the leader among them.
During the first three time periods, all of the continents showed consistency in trends. Asia started with 50% of the world production output and experienced a 20% drop in the first 40 years; then, Asia showed the lowest numbers in 1920, at 20%. In contrast, the rest of the world contributed just 10% to the world’s production output in 1840; then, by 1880, it reached 25% and grew to 30% in 1920. In 1840, Europe’s production output was 40%, gained 5% during the first four decades, and achieved its zenith of 50% in the year 1920.
Moving on to 1960, Asia’s production output totaled 25%, meanwhile, the rest of the world and Europe produced equal output. In the last time period, the rest of the world’s production output surpassed Europe, showing a bit more than 30%. Conversely, Asia returned to production output dominance, displaying around 45%.
The graph illustrates the oil manufacturing and usage in China from 1982 to 2006, units presented in millions of oil barrels per day.
Overall, approximately in first two decades production of oil exceeded the consumption. Then, demand for oil gradually increased, meanwhile production process volume remained consistent.
During the first decade, the production rose from 2 million of oil barrels daily to 3 million and kept steady until around 1995. In contrast, in first 20 years 2 million of oil barrels were used on a daily basis. Then tendency changed between 1985 and 1995, demand for oil increased and reached almost 3.5 million of barrels per day.
Pattern for oil consumption prolonged, in 2005 more than 4 million of oil barrels were used daily. In the next 5 years oil demand increased and achieved the mark of 5 million barrels. Finally, by the 2010 oil consumption attained peak numbers, more than 6 million of barrels everyday. Trend for oil production was not so sharp, from 1995 to 2005 we can see a slight incline, then during the last 5 years production volume strenghtened, but still was smooth in contrast to consumption.
5.5
The pie charts illustrate how three types of nutrients are distributed across different meals in the USA.
Overall, dinner accounts for the largest proportions of both sodium and saturated fat, while added sugar is mainly consumed in snacks, with the remaining meals making up smaller shares.
Dinner remains the dominant category and represents approximately 40% of total meals. By comparison, lunch accounts for just under 30% of total sodium and saturated fat. Surprisingly, both snacks and breakfast make up the same proportion of sodium intake, at 14% each. However, snacks display a clear contrast, just over 20%, while breakfast is slightly lower, at 16%, making it less significant than other meals.
In contrast, snacks constitutes a substantial share of added sugar, slightly above 40%, whereas dinner accounts for a smaller proportion than in both sodium and saturated fat, just under a quarter, at 23%. The figure for breakfast stays constant at 16%, making up the smallest percentage of all types of nutrients.
Band 9.0
Hello! May I ask what made you say this is a band 9 task? No ill tone, just curious.
please send my right level of writing task 1
The word pineapple exports by the Country A, Country B and Country C has been illustrated by the bar chart in 2009 and 2019. While the pie chart compers how the cost was divided to the consumer in 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that country A export most pineapples, while distribution s retail recarded the largest pineapples shear in the wold
In trans of pineapple exports, country A accounted for about 1 million metric tonnes in 2009, which increased dramatically at 10 million metric tonnes in 2019. On the other hand Country B, stood at approximately 5 million metric tonnes in the intel year it had decreased to just 2 million metric tonnes in 2019. Moreover, Country C pineapple exports in 2009 around 0.5 million metric tonnes, it incresed slightly afther 10 year, reaching 1 million metric tonnes.
When it comes to the brackdown of cost, export costs made up 4%, which was lowst followed by producer and important licences at 5% and 10% respectively. In contrast, distribution s retail and profit contributed the higest component at 35% and 18% . In addition international transport and texes both were relatively similar at 12% and 16% in that oder.
8.5
The given table chart provides information about the underground railway systems in six developed cities, such as London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington, Kyoto, and Los Angeles.
Overall, London had the oldest railway system with the longest length, while Los Angeles had the newest, and Kyoto had the shortest route. Moreover, Tokyo and Paris show the largest number of passengers annually, while Kyoto, Washington DC, and Los Angeles illustrate the smallest.
Firstly, the railway in London was built in 1863, and the length of the system made up a 394-kilometer route, but the annual number of passengers shows the smallest statistic, about 775 million. Moreover, Paris and Tokyo’s networks were constructed in 1900 and 1927, with similar lengths, such as 199 and 155, which are shorter than London’s, but compose the largest number of users per year, approximately 1928 and 1191 million people.
By contrast, Washington DC, opened in 1976, has a route of 126 kilometers and serves 144 million passengers yearly. Kyoto, which began operation in 1981, has the shortest route at 11 kilometers and the lowest number of passengers, at 45 million per year. Finally, Los Angeles, the newest system, opened in 2001, has a route of 28 kilometers and carries 50 million passengers annually.