IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
Hello everyone
This exercise is very difficult but absolutely developing! I recommend you to use it.
its hard to boost a score
Definitely! I agree
guyssssss i’m gonna pass my ielts test this friday aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Congratulations! I hope I will be able to say that.
There are many individuals who believe that capital punishment ought not to be used; meanwhile, others think that it is crucial for felonies. I believe that the death penalty is necessary for serious crimes because the level of crime might be reduced; however, there are some convicts who can contribute to society.
First and foremost, capital punishment will be needed if there is a felony because crime committers resist the legislation, and the rate of crime may decline, which is reliable for people to live peacefully. This can be seen in ancient Rome; if somebody had committed a crime, they would have executed that person in front of the public. Similarly, wise people used to cut the person’s body depending on the criminal act; even if the illegal activity was petty, they used to slice the guilty human’s body. This punishment was convenient for the judge and community because such penalties taught the new generation not to break the law; thereafter, the percentage of crime decreased time by time.
Secondly, the death penalty is not needed for some convicts because of their ability, which can contribute to society, such as being an actor who is biased for TV watchers or a model who made the fashion brands famous, even a doctor who treats hazardous diseases without knowledge. For example, in South Korea, there is a criminal who can heal complex illnesses easily, although there are qualified doctors who cannot medicate such sickness. Today, he went viral on the internet, and for the time being, he treated almost 20 people with diseases such as cancer and malignant tumors.
To conclude, capital punishment should never used for convicts who have the ability to contribute to society; meanwhile, it can reduce crime rates. Personally, I think that it is beneficial for individuals who possess hazardous illnesses not to execute criminals.
band 7.5. Task response is suufficeinet, but it has to hav eimmaculate grammar to boos the score
In some areas of the US, adolescents are not permitted by their parents to go outside after a certain time at nighttime unless they are with a grown-up. I totally agree with this because it is dangerous for young people to be out late at night, and most of them are irresponsible when it comes to making decisions.
Children should remain indoors at night because it is not safe. They tend to be more vulnerable to criminal activity that occurs at midnight. Moreover, adolescents are hardly able to protect themselves from dangers. Therefore, it is better for teenagers to have acurfew in order for them to stay safe. For example, there has been an increase in stabbing victims in London, and most of them are teenagers. Thus, the restriction will prevent harm to teenagers’ well-being from criminal threats.
In addition, teens are sometimes irresponsible because they often act spontaneously and rarely think of the consequences of their actions. Consequently, they are likely to make more mistakes from their decision-making. Hence, if a curfew is compelled, they can avoid getting in trouble in late-night hours. For instance, in the UK, teenagers are often caught by police for drinking at midnight in the park on the weekend.
In conclusion, setting a curfew is needed to protect juveniles from dangers that mostly occur at midnight. In addition, keeping adolescents indoors at certain hours will protect them from doing irresponsible actions that will jeopardize their future. I agree that restriction hours will give many benefits to teenagers.
Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people’s behaviour. What is your opinion?
It is widely debated that illustrating violence on television and in computer games has a negative impact on individuals. I strongly agree with this because the normalisation of violence harms the development of teenagers and children, furthermore leading to increased glamorization of criminal activities.
There are many harmful types of computer games you can access online, which do not require any age registration. Without any registration, violent games are exposed to people whose frontal lobes have not been fully developed yet, resulting on influence of these acts on their minds. Children who consume this violence tend to act on it in social occasions such as schools, playgrounds or in their houses with their parents. Generally speaking, caretakers of the children are not aware that the cause of their children’s behaviour is the games they play, as well as the television shows they consume with their family. I am certain that to prevent this, both parents and ministries should take action by leading children into more educational and less harmful content.
In addition, I believe displaying aggression in the media contributes to criminal groups gaining more confidence, increasing crime rates. Another possibility would be making these kinds of groups seem cooler among society, resulting in people associating with illegal groups. I believe that to lower the impact of this, social media industries must stop these types of content from spreading on their applications.
Taking everything into consideration, I believe there is no doubt that violence in the media does impact society. And I believe the best way to prevent all of this is for the responsible companies and ministries to take the required action.
Band 5 really bad
Read my essay and evaluate it. In the future all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages? In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless, leaving only passengers inside these vehicles. While self-driving cars may have some safety problems, I strongly believe their advantages far outweigh their drawbacks.
One major advantage of driverless vehicles is the comfort they provide. The navigation and GPS systems of self-driving cars can deliver people to their destination. As a result, passengers are relieved from the need to drive in congested roads or park in a confined space, issues which are particularly prevalent in metropolitan cities. In several cities such as Los Angeles and New York, for example, passengers in driverless cars can rest or do other essential jobs while they are commuting. This convenience is especially helpful for employees in highly demanding careers such as finance or law.
Another significant benefit is their contribution to vulnerable groups in society. With driverless cars, disabled or elderly people can commute independently. Consequently, the costs associated with transport such as hiring a driver or taking a taxi are reduced considerably. This financial saving can be spent to meet rising living costs or healthcare.
Admittedly, driverless cars may pose a risk to the safety of passengers, as some of their technical features have not fully developed yet. However, this issue is largely transitional. As society becomes increasingly dependent on self-driving vehicles, many governments will implement stringent regulations regarding their safety. Furthermore, manufacturers will consistently rectify the technical flaws to gain customers’ trust, which in turn would increase their sales. Driverless vehicles, therefore, are likely to gradually become a safe and reliable mode of transport over time.
In conclusion, although self-driving cars have some safety concerns, the benefits they offer to passengers are far more crucial. Given the growing need for mobility, not only is the driverless car desirable, but it is also both necessary and practical.
Nowadays, the increasing popularity of virtual and augmented reality is transforming entertainment and education. Some people believe that these advanced technologies are replacing real-world experiences. In my opinion, while they may take some of those experiences’ places, they are also contributing to a decline in physical activity and engagement among individuals.
First of all, students use technology in their daily lives, including artificial intelligence programs. These tools are easily accessible, particularly since many applications offer free access for students. As a result, when it comes to completing homework, projects, or other tasks, they often rely on AI applications. However, I believe it is crucial for individuals to learn from their own experiences, both successes and failures. Over time, this reliance on technology might lead to laziness, disconnecting them from real-life interactions. This could have serious consequences for the future.
Secondly, it is clear that the entertainment sector has been significantly affected over the past two years worldwide. Our enjoyment of fun activities has already suffered. For instance, at concerts, many people focus on recording videos or taking selfies, often missing the actual experience. They fail to realize that the most valuable moments are those shared in memories rather than on social media. Unfortunately, social media often represents a distorted view of reality.
Lastly, while the new technological landscape offers advantages, it also comes with disadvantages that adversely impact both entertainment and education. We should strive to use these technologies in more productive ways that promote genuine real-world engagement.