IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker
Instantly and precisely evaluate your task 2 essay with detailed feedback
(Looking for writing task 1 report checker/writing task 1 letter checker?)
Click here to explore thousands of task 2 essays written by our users
Overall Band Score
0.0Task Response
0.0Coherence & Cohesion
0.0Lexical Resource
0.0Grammatical Range & Accuracy
0.0Improved Naturalness Comparison
Enhanced Essay Comparison
Disclaimer
This tool should be seen as a guide rather than a definitive score. Just like human reviewers, AI can be subjective, and the score provided may be accurate within 75%-95% when compared with an official IELTS score. Use this tool to complement your study, but not as a substitute for professional assessment or official IELTS grading.
Introducing the Ultimate IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker: Instant, Accurate, and Free!
Say hello to our cutting-edge, AI-driven IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Checker, designed to transform your test preparation experience! This innovative online tool provides instant and free correction and evaluation of your IELTS essays, ensuring you’re on the right track to success.
Our advanced AI technology meticulously assesses your writing, delivering comprehensive feedback and invaluable insights to help you excel in both IELTS Academic and General Training. With this powerful assessment tool at your fingertips, you can confidently hone your writing skills and achieve your desired IELTS score.
One the one hand, many believe that spending excessively on special occasions is stressful and waste of money.The primary reason is that it can disturbs families saving funds. When individuals allocate a great amount of money on special occasions, it may lead to struggle to manage their financials. For example, it has been observed that a considerable proportion of people creates instability of their income by spending theft money and indulge in debt easily. As a result, such spending is often stressful for them.
.
Band: 8.0
It is true that e-mail has brought benefits to the development of professional and social connection. While there are some drawbacks, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are some aspects of e-mail, principally, lack of personal interaction, which raises cause for concern. E-mails do not allow face-to-face communication, which can reduce emotional connection and cause misunderstandings. In addition, e-mails are associated with security risks, such as hacking and phishing, which may cause loss of personal and professional information. For instance, some data about company security can be stolen by hackers, whereas employers share this information via e-mail.
On the other hand, despite such grave issues, these are not insurmountable and must be
considered against the advantages of the progress of communication. Firstly, e-mails allow for fast and effective communication in long-distance relationships and partnerships. It provides a comfortable area for people to connect with each other quickly and solve their problems easily. Secondly, digital touch has an environmentally friendly side, which paves the way for a decline in paper consumption. Thanks to this, a decrease in environmental damage may be observed.
In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of e-mail for both personal and
professional connection are greater than the drawbacks, serious though these are.
topic: Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Band: 9.0
In this day and age, contemporary attention has been placed on whether to learn a language in spite of the omnipresence of translation tools on the internet. While no one can deny the convenience of available translation apps, I firmly believe that learning a language offers a myriad of benefits, far outweighing total dependence on translation software.
Advocates of translation gadgets may argue that they are extremely convenient for non-native speakers to exchange ideas with native speakers. For example, an American traveler to Japan can talk to the indigenous people regarding their wishes so that language barriers are no longer a major concern; therefore, enjoying every journey to other countries to experience new things, like cuisine, scenery, landscape, etc., might be much more fulfilling, without much language hindrance. Language tools, although they might be effective in translating, may sometimes produce incorrect translations, being time-consuming for both target listeners and users if the speaker’s voice is not fully captured repeatedly, especially in a noisy environment. Translation tools, therefore, may occasionally cause frustration for people, or even prevent users from having a deep conversation with foreigners in certain cases.
On the other hand, there are some stronger reasons to support the idea that learning a foreign language should be encouraged. First, bilingual or multilingual individuals can make friends around the world and open their horizons by gaining insights into the finest values of that nation. With language ability, they may even broaden their career prospects in certain cases by becoming an interpreter or a language teacher, or working for their dream company in another country. In many studies, language learners have a higher level of cognitive ability than monolinguals, making their brains more neuroplastic and reducing the rate of contracting Alzheimer’s disease. In the business landscape, individuals with language proficiency would be able to identify linguistic tricks in contracts, reducing the risks of potential financial losses, fostering healthier business cooperation, and creating growth and prosperity for business partners and the country as a whole. Thus, being multilingual is ideal as this provides many worthwhile advantages.
In conclusion, although some positive impacts of translation software on users are undeniable, I firmly believe that learning a foreign language provides more appealing benefits. Governments, I suppose, should sponsor students, especially those in underprivileged areas, so learning languages is accessible to all, creating an egalitarian society.
BAND 8.5
In many parts of the world, people are facing hunger despite a lot of progress in agriculture. I think poverty, inequality, and poor government policies are the root causes of this concern, and that through better regime planning and poverty reduction programmes, this issue can be tackled.
There are various factors contributing to this issue. First of all, poverty is to blame, as people without any money are not able to purchase food and, in turn, suffer from hunger. Take the example of Nigeria, where during the economic crisis of 2008, poverty increased, giving rise to starvation. Thus, poverty is the driving force in this regard.
Secondly, people suffer from inequality in every corner of the globe. The rich are becoming richer, and poor people are living below the poverty line. Needy citizens are unable to reach even the basic facilities of life just because authoritative persons stock all the things to sell them at higher rates, and in return, underprivileged residents suffer from malnutrition.
Last but not least, poor regime strategies are the main reasons for a rapid rise in this trouble, as weak laws and regulations lead to hunger. For instance, a survey was conducted in Nepal, and the results were shocking. According to the survey’s report, it is expected that starvation will rise threefold by the year 2029, just because of a substandard leadership approach. Hence, a weak executive system gives rise to hunger.
However, there are multiple solutions available to solve this problem. The primary solution I believe would be to start poverty reduction programmes, as these will help needy people to have access to food. Moreover, by improving the government system, hunger can be banished from the world, as strong laws and regulations will help in this regard. In addition to this, equal opportunities should be provided to every person, as it will erase hunger.
To sum up, although poverty, inequality, and bad authoritative strategies are widespread in the world, I suppose that through an improved regime approach and poverty reduction programmes, and providing equal opportunities to everyone, this issue can be curtailed.
It is indeed becoming increasingly common for people using the internet to know news then reading magazines or watching media. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure
There are several reasons for getting announcment from the internet that canbring positive outcomes. One of the most compelling reasons is that providing rich multimedia which engages with video, audio, and interactive graphics that enhance understanding. It’s useful and interesting than traditional media. In addition, access news anytime, anywhere on mobiele devices, fitting into busy schedules also they are free and cheaper than print subscriptions.
Despite the above benefits, there are some drawbacks. Firstly, it sometimes gives misinformation and fake news. False or manipulated stories spread rapidly, sometimes intentionally making it hard to tell what’s real, especially with deepfakes and AL content, so we sometimes rely on traditional media such as newspapers and magazines. Secondly, the sheer volume of newscreates an overwhelming ” internet mess” making it hard to focus on important stories. AL generated content leading to confusion and even anxiety.
In conclusion, the increase in using online network for getting report will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on individuals and on the society BAND5
uraaaaaaaaa!!!!
CONGRATULATE WITH BAND7
Are its results real or fake? They always give 8.5 Can I get this score in the mains exam? Can I get even less?
In today’s globalized world, the issue of child-free marriages among couples has become increasingly prevalent. It is a subject of heated debate, with some individuals emphasizing the numerous benefits associated with it, while others highlight its potential drawbacks. This essay will explore both perspectives, weighing the merits and disadvantages, and will conclude by presenting my own viewpoint.
To begin with, assessing whether the decision of married partners to remain childless is advantageous or detrimental requires a careful analysis of multiple factors. Many proponents argue that choosing not to raise children after marriage plays an indispensable role in contemporary society. Its influence can be seen in various spheres, including social, moral, and economic dimensions. For instance, the positive effects of a child-free lifestyle for couples are apparent in how it fosters innovation and enhances quality of life. A report by The National Tv that over 80% of individuals experienced notable improvements in their standard of living due to remaining without parental responsibilities, which underscores the widespread belief that voluntary childlessness in marriage is crucial to the advancement of modern life.
However, opponents contend that the growing trend of couples avoiding parenthood comes with its own set of challenges. They argue that it is responsible for several negative consequences that affect not only society at large but also individual well-being. One of the major concerns is the potential harm long-term child-free family structures causes, which could lead to long-term global issues, such as increased inequality or environmental degradation.
In conclusion, it is evident that the choice of married couples not to have children has both significant advantages and notable disadvantages. While the negative aspects cannot be ignored, I firmly believe that the benefits of opting out of parenthood in today’s world are substantial and essential for progress. Nevertheless, a balanced approach is crucial to ensuring that the positive effects are maximized while mitigating any harmful outcome
people in reddit mostly said that engnovate gives score that tend to be lower than the real test
I want to improve my english to pass the ielts test in February pls help me
i have on 4 jan
Hey there, how is it going? I hope you got everything correct on the first session=)
The children must learn what is acceptable and unacceptable when they are little. To a certain extent I agree that parents and teachers should teach how to behave ethical , however I also believe that using punishment is not crucial for develop of good manner .
Significantly, human should learn ethical norms of society at an early age. One important reason is that , human’s brain is growing when 3,4 years old and it is the best period for absorbing any information. Young child learn a language and it will become native language , but other languages will be learnt by extra effort and it is hard to speak automatically and without thinking. Therefore behaviours are learnt like this process also.
There is a way to grasp moral concepts that is punishment . İt means that if a kid act unacceptable , parents make a situation which which make them feel like guilty, anxious, then they will try not to act like that anymore. Generally, it is not best method to pick up new social skills. This is because, this approach make young learner more curios about these taboos for reason of propensity of identify unknown things clear. İn addition, if he has chance to break rules , he will. İt is dangerous actually. In addition , other way to help children grasp moral concepts is minor punishments. However, these should not only focus on enforcing rules, but also help children understand the feelings of others and develop a sense of fairness and empathy. As a result, it is significant to explain why we are not allowed to behave particular way.
İn conclusion , it is major factor for young child development that acquire proper and improper. To sum up, parents and teacher should tend to demonstrate social rules without punishment
BAND 8.0
It is becoming more common for multinational companies to operate in developing countries. In my view, the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages because this can create more job opportunities and enhance the relationship between two nations.
To begin with, it is undeniable that developing countries have higher unemployment rates compared to developed countries. Therefore, establishing multinational companies will create more job opportunities in those countries. As a result, this action will foster the economic condition in the country. One of the prime examples of this is when a multinational company has been built in a developing country; therefore, many new job opportunities, such as truck drivers, social media admins, and other occupations, are created. Hence, a multinational company in a developing country is very essential to the growth of its economic situation.
As for the second reason, working together with another country to build a multinational company can benefit both countries. This can improve the relationship between them. A strong relationship between countries can foster further projects together in the future or help each other if there is an unfortunate condition. For example, Japan built a car manufacturer in Indonesia, while Indonesia sends some workers to Japan. This is why an increasing level of relationship between countries will bring some kinds of benefits to them.
To sum up, this essay explains why building multinational companies in developing countries can have more advantages because multinational companies are important for fostering the growth of developing countries and developing further benefits from having a strengthened relationship between countries.