People are divided on the weather, it should be legal for citizens to carry their own weapons. On the one hand, personal guns can be necessary for self-defense. Guns offer a way for people to defend themselves when help isn’t immediately available. For example, in remote areas where the police are far away, having a gun can help residents protect against threats in addition if people are on a firearm. They are less likely to become victims of crime. Firearms can be actually scared of parklers reducing the risk of being targeted. On the other hand, there are certain disadvantages in allowing people to own guns. First of all, guns are sometimes used in crimes. This can happen when someone with mental health problems gets hold of weapons. For example, there are cases where the destroyed teenagers got guns at home and ended up shooting their classmates or teachers at school. Second, the less access people have to guns allowers and now murder rate. Countries that have strict gun control usually report favorite crimes. Crimes for instance in Uzbekistan guns are tightly controlled and gun related crimes are pretty rare compared to countries where people can easily buy guns. Overall, I think the disadvantage of gun ownership outweighs its advantages. If we want a safe society with a lower murder rate, gun ownership should be strictly controlled or even banned.
Band 7+: Citizens should be allowed to carry personal guns
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were submitted by one of our users.
71%
Accuracy
The overall pronunciation accuracy of your speech, reflecting how well a native speaker can comprehend it.
Polished transcript:
Male
Female
People are divided on whether it should be legal for citizens to carry their own weapons. On the one hand, personal guns can be necessary for self-defense. Guns offer a way for people to defend themselves when help isn't immediately available. For example, in remote areas where the police are far away, having a gun can help residents protect against threats. In addition, if people have firearms, they are less likely to become victims of crime. Firearms can actually scare off potential attackers, reducing the risk of being targeted. On the other hand, there are certain disadvantages to allowing people to own guns. First of all, guns are sometimes used in crimes. This can happen when someone with mental health problems gets hold of weapons. For example, there are cases where disturbed teenagers got guns at home and ended up shooting their classmates or teachers at school. Second, the less access people have to guns, the lower the murder rate. Countries that have strict gun control usually report fewer crimes. For instance, in Uzbekistan, guns are tightly controlled, and gun-related crimes are pretty rare compared to countries where people can easily buy guns. Overall, I think the disadvantages of gun ownership outweigh its advantages. If we want a safe society with a lower murder rate, gun ownership should be strictly controlled or even banned.
Actual audio transcript (What native speakers are likely to hear):
Tips: Click on each word to see feedback.
Speaking Time: 90 seconds