Band 4+: Do you believe that governments should prioritize funding for space exploration, or are there more pressing issues on Earth?

Your pronunciation is average. It is understandable but not always accurate. Focusing on the rhythm and stress patterns of English could prove beneficial.

The response addresses the topic but fails to engage with the core tension of the question, which is the comparison between space exploration and environmental issues. The answer focuses on 'family parks,' which is a very narrow interpretation of 'environmental issues' and does not address the broader global or ecological context implied by the question. Additionally, the reasoning provided - that visiting parks helps people understand their government - is somewhat tangential to the primary debate regarding resource allocation. To improve, aim to discuss large-scale environmental concerns such as climate change, pollution, or biodiversity loss, and directly compare the necessity of these issues against the benefits of space exploration.

The response lacks logical progression and fails to address the core of the question (the comparison between space exploration and environmental issues). You spent too much time using 'filler' phrases like 'It's a good question and a good opportunity for me to answer.' In Part 3, you should dive straight into your argument. To improve, use cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand,' 'Conversely,' or 'Furthermore' to link your ideas logically.

The vocabulary is quite limited and, in some places, inaccurate. For example, 'provide pro-tries' and 'make the noise very well' do not convey a clear meaning in this context. You also struggled to find the right words to discuss complex topics like 'prioritization' or 'allocation of resources.' Try to learn topic-specific vocabulary related to 'government spending,' 'sustainability,' and 'scientific advancement.'

There are significant grammatical errors that impede communication. The sentence structures are simple and often broken. For instance, 'Government should provide...' should be 'Governments should provide...' and the connection between visiting parks and 'understanding their government' is grammatically and logically weak. Work on subject-verb agreement and using complex sentence structures (subordinate clauses) to express more sophisticated ideas.