Band 6+: do you think tourism damages the environment

Your pronunciation is above average. However, you may find complexity in certain words challenging. Regular practice should aid in improvement.

The answer is relevant to the question and provides a nuanced perspective by acknowledging the role of tourist behavior. However, it could benefit from more specific examples of environmental damage and mitigation strategies. Expanding on the types of damage and the methods used to reduce the impact would strengthen the response.

The answer is coherent and well-organized. The speaker uses appropriate cohesive devices like "for example" and "but". Fluency is good, with only minor hesitations. Minor improvements could be made by using more sophisticated linking words and phrases to enhance the flow.

The vocabulary is adequate and mostly accurate. Words like "mitigate" show a good range. However, more precise and sophisticated vocabulary could be used to express the nuances of environmental damage. For example, instead of 'a lot of environmental impact', consider using terms like 'significant ecological degradation' or 'substantial environmental pollution'.

Grammar is mostly accurate, with only minor errors. Sentence structures are varied, but some sentences could be improved for greater complexity and precision. For instance, the phrase 'if they try to minimize their risk to our environment' could be refined to 'if they strive to minimize their environmental impact'.