I genuinely believe that overturism puts back negative consequences for localities. It’s not immediate but lingering in the long run. Abolution in almost over-straction originates from visitors who lead cardboard footprints by flying or driving to the destination until a wave single-use water bottles and plastic bags somewhere in sufficient facilities for waste separation and recycling. Additionally, most detonations captivate an abundance of tourists witnessing an increasing cost of living in both stone indigenous communities resulting in small locals living in a detonation due to no longer afford to extremely high rental fees. So, why is it my same tempting to accidents to lead to spoil the environment, raising awareness among travelers and some of win-win benefits?
Band 6+: How do places change when too many tourists visit them?
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were submitted by one of our users.
63%
Accuracy
The overall pronunciation accuracy of your speech, reflecting how well a native speaker can comprehend it.
Polished transcript:
Male
Female
I genuinely believe that overtourism has negative consequences for localities. It's not immediate but lingers in the long run. Pollution in almost every destination originates from visitors who leave carbon footprints by flying or driving to the location, along with a wave of single-use water bottles and plastic bags overwhelming facilities for waste separation and recycling. Additionally, most destinations attract an abundance of tourists, leading to an increasing cost of living in both urban and indigenous communities, resulting in locals being unable to afford extremely high rental fees. So, why is it so tempting to ignore the impact on the environment, raising awareness among travelers about the win-win benefits?
Actual audio transcript (What native speakers are likely to hear):
Tips: Click on each word to see feedback.
Speaking Time: 44 seconds