Band 5+: Who do you think should be more responsible for protecting the environment, individuals or the government?

Your pronunciation is very good. Aim to refine subtleties and intonation to further improve.

The answer directly addresses the topic by discussing both individuals and the government, and it provides a balanced view. It includes specific examples of actions each party can take, such as making laws and saving water. However, to achieve a higher score, the response could be developed further with more detailed personal experience or specific scenarios. Additionally, elaborating on how the two parties can collaborate effectively would strengthen the argument. The response could be expanded as it currently feels quite brief.

The answer is coherent and logically organized, with a clear introduction, supporting points, and a conclusion. However, there is a minor self-correction ('low-spilled' to 'recycling systems') and a slight lack of smoothness in the transition between ideas. To improve, use more cohesive devices (e.g., 'Furthermore', 'In addition') and avoid self-corrections by planning your response more carefully.

The vocabulary is adequate but limited. The phrase 'low-spilled' is incorrect and should be 'strict laws' or 'strict regulations'. You also use simple words like 'matter' and 'work together' which are fine but not very precise. To achieve a higher score, use more varied and precise vocabulary, such as 'implement', 'enforce', 'allocate funds', 'sustainable practices', and 'collaborative efforts'.

The grammar is mostly accurate, with correct use of modal verbs ('can', 'should') and a clear sentence structure. However, there is a minor error: 'the public transport' should be 'use public transport' (missing verb). Also, the sentence 'Neither side can solve environmental problems alone' is correct but could be expanded with more complex structures, such as conditional sentences or relative clauses, to demonstrate a wider range.