Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image depicts four pie charts detailing Germany and France's electricity generation in 2009 (560 billion kWh for Germany, 510 billion kWh for France), split into all types (conventional thermal, renewables, nuclear) and renewables (biomass, hydroelectric, solar, wind, geothermal); Germany's total electricity from conventional thermal 59.6%, nuclear 23%, renewables 17.4%; within renewables: biomass 39.3%, wind 36.9%, hydroelectric 17.7%, solar 6.1%, geothermal 0%; France's total electricity from nuclear 76%, conventional thermal 10.3%, renewables 13.7%; within renewables: hydroelectric 80.5%, biomass 8.1%, wind 10.5%, solar 0.9%, geothermal 0%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.
The pie chart illustrates that all sources in addition renewable in the year 2009, the electricity generated by Germany and France. Overall, it can be seen that there is comparative information by choosing and reporting the principal features about two countries.
The bulk of Electricity in Germany shows 59.6% Conventional thermal. It means that most kinds of electrical energy are created. The insignificant minority of renewable shows only a small minority. Nuclear illustrates a significant proportion of this pie chart. It is relatively less than Germany’s nuclear number. However France’s conventional thermal well below than Germany.
Moving to renewables makes up to amount 80.5% hydroelectric in France. It is slightly less than 17.7% hydroelectric in Germany. However, wind energy in Germany which was much over than France. In detail, in Germany, most of the renewables consisted of wind and biomass totaling around 75%, which was far higher than hydroelectric and solar.
Word Count: 151
