Bar Chart

Band 6+: The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a bar graph detailing waste management methods across four cities: Toronto has 70% landfill, 5% incineration, 25% recycling, 0% composting; Madrid shows 50% landfill, 15% incineration, 20% recycling, 15% composting; Kuala Lumpur is at 85% landfill, 10% recycling, 5% composting, 0% incineration; Amman reports 50% landfill, 0% incineration, 20% recycling, 30% composting.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart illustrates different methods of waste disposal in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

Overall, it can be seen that landfill recorded the highest figures in Toronto and Amman, while composting recorded the lowest figures in all cities. Recycling recorded identical figures Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, meanwhile incineration recorded the highest figures in both cities.

Regarding Toronto, the proportion of landfill waste stood at 75%, making it the highest figure among all cities. There were similar figures recorded in incineration, recycling and composting at around 10%, 8% and 7%. Incineration recorded the highest proportion of waste in Madrid. Landfill stood at 24%, compared with only 9% in composting.

The figure for recycling recorded same proportion of 22% in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur. Incineration again stood at the highest figure of 50% in Kuala Lumpur, whereas landfill waste accounted at around 18%. Incineration recorded the highest figure of 38%, however composting recorded the lowest figure of 13%.

Give me a band

Word Count: 162

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C2 - Complex
Continue to challenge and refine your language choices.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

recorded: 9

highest: 6

figures: 5

incineration: 5

figure: 5

waste: 4

madrid: 4

kuala: 4

lumpur: 4

landfill: 4

toronto: 3

composting: 3

recycling: 3

proportion: 3

stood: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report attempts to address the task but contains significant inaccuracies and misinterpretations of the data. Key figures are incorrect (e.g., Toronto landfill at 75% instead of 70%, incineration at 10% instead of 5%, recycling at 8% instead of 25%, composting at 7% instead of 0%). The overall trend statement is misleading, as composting is not the lowest in all cities (e.g., in Amman it is 30%, and in Toronto it is 0%). The report also incorrectly states that incineration recorded the highest figures in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, which contradicts the data (landfill is highest in both). The structure is somewhat logical, but the inaccuracies in key areas detract from task achievement. To improve, ensure accurate data extraction and provide a clear, correct overview of the main trends.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction and an overview, and it groups information by city. However, the flow is sometimes disrupted by unclear referencing and abrupt transitions. For example, the phrase 'while composting recorded the lowest figures in all cities' is not accurate based on the data, and the sentence 'Incineration recorded the highest figures in both cities' is confusing because it is not clear which two cities are being referred to. The paragraphing could be improved by grouping cities more logically and using cohesive devices more effectively to guide the reader.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a range of vocabulary related to waste management (e.g., 'proportion', 'stood at', 'accounted for', 'recorded'). However, there is some repetition and imprecise word choices. For instance, 'recorded' is used frequently, and phrases like 'recorded identical figures Madrid and Kuala Lumpur' are missing a preposition. The report would benefit from more varied and precise language, such as 'accounted for', 'constituted', or 'represented', and from using synonyms to avoid repetition. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings. Examples include 'recorded identical figures Madrid and Kuala Lumpur' (missing 'in'), 'landfill waste accounted at around 18%' (should be 'accounted for'), and 'Incineration again stood at the highest figure of 50% in Kuala Lumpur' (which is factually incorrect and grammatically awkward). Punctuation is generally correct, but the errors in prepositions and article usage affect clarity. To improve, the writer should proofread for preposition use and ensure subject-verb agreement.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart compares the proportion of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in year 2010. Overall, the highest percentage of people who waste landfill,While the proportion of waste compositing was the lowest in the given year. In terms of wasting,Toronto landfill was largest from others side in 2010 at around 75%,but […]

Band 4+

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart compares the proportion of four types of waste across four different cities during 2010. It is clear from the chart that the lowest amount of waste came from compositing in all four countries and the highest proportion was either landfill waste or incineration waste. For Toronto, The highest amount of waste came […]

Band 5+

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart illustrates the proportions of different types of waste management in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman in 2010. Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the largest percentages of waste dumped on landfills belonged to Toronto and Amman, while another popular method-incineration- prevailed in Kuala Lumpur. Notably, the least used […]

Band 7+

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of different types of waste management in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman in 2010. Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the largest percentage of waste dumped on landfills belonged to Toronto and Amman, while another popular method-incineration prevailed in Kuala Lumpur. Notably, the least used […]

Band 6+

See All

The given bar chart illustrates the population of Jakarta, Shanghai and Sao Paulo in 1990, as well as the estimated and actual figures of the populations in 2000

The bar chart represents the predicition and total upward in the population of Jakarta, Shanghai and Sao Paulo in 1990 to 2000. Overall,Sao Paulo has recorded the most highest population size in 2000 actual figures. Sao Paulo,s size second highest in 2000 in predicition. Then Shanghai has recorded the highest population size in 1990. Lowest […]

Band 4+

The chart below shows the percentage of children in a European country who took part in four kinds of activities in 2009

The bar chart table illustrates the proportion of three group pupils in a European country who participated in four kinds of activities in 2009. Overall, it is noticeable that the data is divided into four types of activities and three age groups of children. Another interesting point is that watching TV exhibited the top of […]

Band 6+

The bar chart below shows the number of students in five different fields of study at a university in 2010 and 2020.

The bar chart illustrates the number of students in five different majors at a university in 2010 and 2020. Overall, there are three trends shown. Firstly, the number of students in the university grew in 2020. Secondly, Business has the highest number of students in both years. Arts, on the other hand, presented the least […]

Band 6+

The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries.

The line graph illustrates compares the demographic data on senior citizens aged 65 years and over from 1940 to 2016, with predictions up to 2040 in three countries. Overall, it is clear that the elderly’s population rate in all three countries showed an upward trend until 2016 and is expected to rise considerably by 2040. […]

Band 8+

The bar chart shows the number of students enrolled at 3 universities in 2010, 2015 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the number of students admitted at three universities in 2010,2015 and 2020. Overall, it can be seen that university A and C increased in students enrolment during the entire period. While university B experienced upward trend initially, after which it fell during last year. In 2010, university B showed the highest […]

Band 6+

See All

Band 6+: The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

The bar chart below shows the percentages of different kinds of landfill waste in five different countries in 2010.

Other Topics:

The given bar chart illustrates the population of Jakarta, Shanghai and Sao Paulo in 1990, as well as the estimated and actual figures of the populations in 2000

The chart below shows the percentage of children in a European country who took part in four kinds of activities in 2009

The bar chart below shows the number of students in five different fields of study at a university in 2010 and 2020.

The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries.

The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart shows the number of students enrolled at 3 universities in 2010, 2015 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium