Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image features two bar charts detailing wildlife conservation funding in millions of US dollars across four sources in 2010 and 2020, with x-axes labeled 'Funding Source' ('Government Grants', 'Private Donations', 'Corporate Sponsorships', 'Tourism Revenue') and y-axes labeled 'Funding (Millions of US Dollars)' with a legend for 2010 and 2020. The top chart, titled 'Wildlife Conservation Funding in Africa (2010 & 2020)' with y-axis ticks from 0 to 140 in increments of 20, lists values for 2010 and 2020 respectively as: Government Grants at 120 and 140; Private Donations at 80 and 110; Corporate Sponsorships at 40 and 50; and Tourism Revenue at 150 and 90. The bottom chart, titled 'Wildlife Conservation Funding in South America (2010 & 2020)' with y-axis ticks from 0 to 120 in increments of 20, lists values for 2010 and 2020 respectively as: Government Grants at 90 and 130; Private Donations at 60 and 80; Corporate Sponsorships at 70 and 90; and Tourism Revenue at 50 and 60.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart compares the major sources of funding for wildlife conservation in two regions, Africa and South America, between 2010 and 2020.

Overall, it is clear that in Africa funding was primarily from tourism revenue, while in South America it was mainly from government grants, highlighting the difference between the two regions.

When comparing wildlife conservation funding from corporate sponsorships, we can observe a decrease of 40 million dollars in 2010. However, in 2010 funding from tourism revenue grew by 140 million dollars, whereas in South America it provided only 50 million dollars in 2010 and 60 dollars in 2020.

Additionally, South America experienced a decline in funding from tourism revenue, from 120 million dollars to just over 50 million dollars in 2020, while other funding sources such as private donations and corporate sponsorships remained unstable.

Word Count: 137

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C2 - Complex
Continue to challenge and refine your language choices.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

funding: 6

dollars: 6

million: 5

south: 4

america: 4

tourism: 3

revenue: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The response addresses the task by comparing funding sources for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America. However, there are several inaccuracies and omissions. For example, the report states a decrease in corporate sponsorships in Africa, but the data shows an increase. It also incorrectly claims tourism revenue grew by 140 million dollars in Africa, when it actually decreased. Additionally, the report mentions a decline in tourism revenue in South America from 120 million to just over 50 million, which is not supported by the data. The overview is partially correct but misses key trends. To improve, ensure accurate data reporting and cover all main features, such as the changes in government grants and private donations. The response would benefit from clearer comparisons and a more precise summary of the main trends. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. However, the progression of ideas within the body paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow due to inconsistent grouping of information and unclear referencing. For example, the second body paragraph begins with corporate sponsorships but then shifts to tourism revenue without a clear transition, and the final paragraph introduces a new point about South America that seems disconnected from the previous discussion. To improve, ensure each paragraph focuses on a clear central theme, use cohesive devices more effectively to link sentences and ideas, and avoid sudden shifts in topic. Additionally, the overview could be more precise by highlighting the main trends for both regions rather than just the primary sources.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, with some attempt at variation (e.g., 'primarily', 'highlighting', 'decline'). However, there are instances of imprecise word choice and awkward phrasing, such as 'remained unstable' (which is vague) and 'we can observe a decrease of 40 million dollars in 2010' (which is unclear). There is also repetition of simple terms like 'funding' and 'million dollars'. To achieve a higher score, aim for more precise and natural collocations (e.g., 'fluctuated', 'rose sharply', 'the dominant source'), and avoid vague expressions. A wider range of vocabulary, used accurately, would enhance the report.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are noticeable grammatical errors that affect clarity. For instance, 'a decrease of 40 million dollars in 2010' is factually incorrect and grammatically awkward (it should specify the source and the correct figure), and '60 dollars in 2020' lacks 'million'. There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and tense consistency in some sentences. To improve, focus on accurate sentence construction, ensure subject-verb agreement, and use a wider range of complex structures with greater control. Proofreading for errors would also help.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The barcharts display primary funding sources for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America in two different years, particularly, 2010 and 2020. Overall, the fundings from different sources have risen in the span of 10 years in both Africa and South America, with Tourism Revenue in Africa being an exception. In Africa, government grands in […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart provides information about the expenditure spent for the conservation of wildlife in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Overall, the funds provided by government grants remained the highest in both regions, while corporate sponsorship remained the lowest in Africa, and tourism revenue held the lowest position in […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graphs illustrate the major sources of wildlife conservation funding in Africa and South America in 2010 and 2020. The sources mentioned in the chart are: government grants, private donations, corporate sponsorships, and tourism revenue. In Africa, government grants were a major source of funds in 2010(120) and it had a marginal gain in 2020, […]

Band 7+

See All

Band 6+: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The bar chart shows the amount of money spent on fast food by income groups. The graph shows the consumption of fast food in Seoul, South Korea from 2000 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the popularity of four major US internet search engines—Google, Yahoo, AOL, and Jeeves—from November 2004 to December 2010, while the table provides data on the number of searches conducted in November 2004 and December 2010.

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium