Multiple Graphs

Band 8+: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image features two bar charts detailing wildlife conservation funding in millions of US dollars across four sources in 2010 and 2020, with x-axes labeled 'Funding Source' ('Government Grants', 'Private Donations', 'Corporate Sponsorships', 'Tourism Revenue') and y-axes labeled 'Funding (Millions of US Dollars)' with a legend for 2010 and 2020. The top chart, titled 'Wildlife Conservation Funding in Africa (2010 & 2020)' with y-axis ticks from 0 to 140 in increments of 20, lists values for 2010 and 2020 respectively as: Government Grants at 120 and 140; Private Donations at 80 and 110; Corporate Sponsorships at 40 and 50; and Tourism Revenue at 150 and 90. The bottom chart, titled 'Wildlife Conservation Funding in South America (2010 & 2020)' with y-axis ticks from 0 to 120 in increments of 20, lists values for 2010 and 2020 respectively as: Government Grants at 90 and 130; Private Donations at 60 and 80; Corporate Sponsorships at 70 and 90; and Tourism Revenue at 50 and 60.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The tables give information about the source of funding for wildlife conservation in two continents (Africa and South America) in 2010 and 2020, measured in millions of US dollars.

Overall, the source for wildlife conservation in Africa mainly came from tourist revenue in 2010 and government grants in 2020. By contrast, wildlife conservation in South America has bigger funding in 2020 from all sources.

In Africa, tourist revenue has the biggest share in 2010 for its wildlife conservation, representing over 140 million before it declined to about 90 million in 2020. In 2020, the biggest funding source came from government grants, at exactly 140 million, while the smallest funding source in both years was corporate sponsorships, with 40 million in 2010 and roughly 50 million in 2020.

On the other hand, wildlife conservation funding in South America in 2010 and 2020 mainly came from government grants, accounting for around 90 million and over 120 million respectively. Conversely, the funding from tourism revenue was only 50 milliion in 2010 and 60 million in 2020, making it the smallest funding source in both years.

Word Count: 182

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

million: 8

funding: 7

source: 5

wildlife: 5

conservation: 5

south: 3

revenue: 3

government: 3

grants: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by providing a clear overview and detailed comparison of funding sources for both regions across the two years. The structure is logical, with a clear introduction, overall summary, and specific details. Minor inaccuracies (e.g., 'tables' instead of 'charts', slight overestimations like 'over 140 million' for tourism revenue in Africa) and a minor omission (private donations in South America) do not detract significantly from the overall quality. To improve, ensure precise terminology and include all key data points for completeness.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is well-organized with a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for each continent. The use of cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'By contrast', 'In Africa', and 'On the other hand' helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. However, the overview could be slightly more comprehensive by summarizing the key trends for both continents in a more balanced way. Additionally, the paragraphing is logical, but the transition between the two main paragraphs could be smoother. Overall, the message is easy to follow, with only minor lapses in cohesion.

Lexical Resource

The report demonstrates a good range of vocabulary appropriate for the task, including terms like 'funding sources', 'government grants', 'corporate sponsorships', 'tourism revenue', and 'accounting for'. There is also some good use of synonyms and paraphrasing, such as 'the biggest share' and 'the smallest funding source'. The language is generally accurate and natural, though there is room for more sophisticated and varied expressions. For instance, instead of repeating 'funding source', you could use 'revenue stream' or 'financial contributor'. Overall, the lexical resource is strong, but a few more advanced collocations and precise terms would elevate it to a higher band. Pay attention to vocabulary repetition to improve the overall score.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report shows a good range of grammatical structures, including comparative forms, passive constructions, and complex sentences. For example, 'the biggest funding source came from government grants' and 'making it the smallest funding source in both years' are used effectively. Punctuation and grammar are generally accurate, with only a minor typo ('milliion' instead of 'million') and a slight awkwardness in the phrase 'the source for wildlife conservation in Africa mainly came from tourist revenue'. The sentence structures are varied and controlled, but there is a slight overuse of simple sentences in the second paragraph. Overall, the grammar is accurate and appropriate, with only minor errors that do not impede understanding.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the major sources of funding for wildlife conservation in two regions, Africa and South America, between 2010 and 2020. Overall, it is clear that in Africa funding was primarily from tourism revenue, while in South America it was mainly from government grants, highlighting the difference between the two regions. When comparing […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The barcharts display primary funding sources for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America in two different years, particularly, 2010 and 2020. Overall, the fundings from different sources have risen in the span of 10 years in both Africa and South America, with Tourism Revenue in Africa being an exception. In Africa, government grands in […]

Band 6+

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart provides information about the expenditure spent for the conservation of wildlife in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Overall, the funds provided by government grants remained the highest in both regions, while corporate sponsorship remained the lowest in Africa, and tourism revenue held the lowest position in […]

Band 6+

See All

The charts below compare the number of bookings and the cost of staying for one night at large and small three-star, four-star and five-star hotels.

The bar charts compare the information about the number of bookings and cost of staying per night at small and large three-star, four-star and five-star hotels. It is clear that the number of bookings for large four-star hotels records by far the highest figure, whereas small five-star hotels account for the lowest bookings. Based on […]

Band 7+

See All

Band 8+: The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The charts below compare the number of bookings and the cost of staying for one night at large and small three-star, four-star and five-star hotels.

The chart below shows the number of cars per 1,000 people in one country, and the average carbon dioxide emissions of a new car, in grams per kilometre, between 1990 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart below shows the number of cars per 1,000 people in one country, and the average carbon dioxide emissions of a new car, in grams per kilometre, between 1990 and 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts below show the percentage of students at one adult education centre taking various courses offered in 1985 and this year. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show information about the primary devices used by adults in the UK to access the internet, and the average weekly hours they spent online, for the years 2015 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium