Bar Chart

Band 6+: The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image is a line graph titled "Recycling Rate for selected materials: 1982 - 2010" with the x-axis representing years from 1982 to 2010 and the y-axis representing recycling rate percentages from 0 to 90%. Four lines represent paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics. In 1982, paper and cardboard had a recycling rate of approximately 20%, glass containers 55%, aluminium cans around 5%, and plastics nearly 0%. In 2010, paper and cardboard increased to about 75%, glass containers to 50%, aluminium cans to 70%, and plastics to almost 20%. Paper and cardboard show a steady increase over the years, with a slight dip between 1990 and 1994. Glass containers saw a gradual decrease over time, with slight fluctuations. Aluminium cans started the lowest but saw significant growth and surpassed other materials by 2010. Plastics began at nearly 0% and had a slower, gradual increase throughout the years.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line chart illustrates how the reclycling rates of four different materials changed such as paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010, starting from 1982 over a period of 28 years.

Overall, it can be seen that there were upward trends in four materials.

According to the chart, the proportion of paper and cardboard started at well over 60% in 1982, compared to 50% of glass containers.As for paper and cardboad, the figure peaked at 80% in 1994 despite minor fluctuation durin the preceding years. Therefore,the figure saw a slight decrease to 70% by the end of the period. However, the same cannot be said for glass containers, which dropped steadily, followed by a gradual recovery to 60% by 2010.

In contrast, aluminum cans saw a significant growth,whereas plastic remained poorly recycled. These trends highlight varying public engagement and infrastructure support for reclycling different materials over a 28 years

Word Count: 155

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B2 - Upper Intermediate
Opt for even more advanced words when appropriate.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

paper: 3

glass: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report addresses the task by describing the main trends for the four materials, but it contains several inaccuracies and omissions. The initial values for paper and cardboard and glass containers are incorrect (stated as 60% and 50% instead of approximately 20% and 55%). The peak for paper and cardboard is misidentified (80% in 1994 instead of a steady increase with a slight dip). The final values for glass containers and paper are also inaccurate. The report omits specific data for aluminium cans and plastics, and the conclusion is vague. To improve, ensure accurate data representation, include specific figures for all materials, and provide a clearer overview of the main trends.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report has a clear overall structure with an introduction and an overview, but the organization of information within paragraphs could be improved. The second paragraph mixes data for paper/cardboard and glass containers without clear separation, and the final paragraph is very brief and lacks development. Cohesive devices are used, but sometimes in a way that draws attention (e.g., 'Therefore, the figure saw...' is not a logical connector). To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear central topic and use a range of linking words and referencing to create a smoother flow.

Lexical Resource

The report uses some appropriate vocabulary for describing trends (e.g., 'upward trends', 'peaked', 'dropped steadily', 'gradual recovery'), but there are also inaccuracies and limited range. For example, 'reclycling' is misspelled, and 'well over 60%' is not supported by the data. The phrase 'varying public engagement and infrastructure support' is a good attempt at paraphrasing, but the overall lexical range is somewhat limited. To improve, use a wider variety of synonyms for 'increase' and 'decrease' and ensure precise data descriptions.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report contains several grammatical errors and awkward phrasings that affect clarity. For instance, 'changed such as' is incorrect, 'cardboad' is misspelled, 'durin' is a typo, and 'a 28 years' is ungrammatical. There are also issues with article usage and sentence structure (e.g., 'the figure saw a slight decrease' is awkward). While some complex structures are attempted, they are not always controlled. To improve, proofread for spelling and basic grammar, and practice using a variety of sentence structures with accurate punctuation.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The chart illustrates the recycling percentage of four different materials (paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics) over a period between 1982 and 2010, with data provided for one particular country. Overall, all materials were recycled more by the end of the period, but the pattern divides them into two groups. While plastics […]

Band 7+

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The chart illustrates the recycling percentage of four different materials(paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics) in a period between 1982 to 2010, with data provided for one particular country. Overall, all materials were recycled more by the end of the period, but the patern divide them into two groups. While plastics and […]

Band 6+

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The following line graph displays the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from the years 1982 to 2010 in a specific country. Generally, the trends shown in all four lines follow an increase, with slight fluctuations. Paper and cardboard is recycled the most in comparison to other materials, although it displays the largest […]

Band 7+

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of four materials – paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics – in a particular country from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard had the highest recycling percentages throughout the period, although their rate experienced fluctuations. In contrast, plastics consistently showed the lowest recycling rate, […]

Band 7+

See All

Percentage of individuals living alone across five distinct age categories

The data delineates the share of individuals residing alone across five distinct age cohorts from 17 to 64 at four points in time between 1850 and 2000. Overall, what stands out is the steeper trajectory of the older age brackets: by 2000, those aged 55-64 accounted for roughly 17%, nearly triple the figure recorded in […]

Band 6+

The chart below shows the gross domestic product of four different countries in 2005 and 2010.

The bar graph displays the GDP of the USA, Japan, China and Germany in the years 2005 and 2010. Overall, all four countries increased their GDP while America had a GDP many times greater than any other country in both years. The other significant feature of this graph is that China nearly tripled its value […]

Band 8+

The bar chart below shows the percentage of people in five different age groups in the UK who used online banking in 2010 and 2025.

The graph depicts data on the percentage of people in five distinct age group in the UK , who used online banking in 2010 and 2025. Overall , using online banking had upward trend over the given period . There are a pattern, the more older group, the less using online banking. From 2010 to […]

Band 6+

The chart below shows information about the favourite subjects of 60 students from two schools, school A and school B. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart highlights information about 60 learners’ favourite subjects from two schools, school A and school B. Overall, the highest figure in non-academic subjects was possessed by School A, whilst the converse was true for School B. Additionally, non-academic subjects were more preferred in School A, while School B had a more balanced preference. Regarding […]

Band 8+

See All

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium